SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories

Filing 150

ORDER re 149 granting STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/20/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 James F. Hurst (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) David J. Doyle (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Samuel S. Park (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Stephanie S. McCallum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-9703 Telephone: 312-558-5600 Facsimile: 312-558-5700 Email: jhurst@winston.com; ddoyle@winston.com; spark@winston.com; smccallum@winston.com Nicole M. Norris (SBN 222785) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 Telephone: 415-591-1000 Facsimile: 415-591-1400 Email: nnorris@winston.com Jeffrey I. Weinberger (SBN 56214) David M. Rosenzweig (SBN 176272) Grant A. Davis-Denny (SBN 229335) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Email: jeffrey.weinberger@mto.com; david.rosenzweig@mto.com; grant.davis-denny@mto.com Michelle Friedland (SBN 234124) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Email: michelle.friedland@mto.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Charles B. Klein (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant Mathew A. Campbell (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ABBOTT LABORATORIES WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 1700 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007 Telephone: 202-282-5000 Facsimile: 202-282-5100 Email: cklein@winston.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION ) d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C07-5702 (CW) (Consolidated Cases) Related per November 19, 2007 Order to Case No. C04-1511 (CW) STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES Winston & Strawn LLP STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES CASE NO. C07-5702 (CW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 WHEREAS, the parties completed fact discovery on February 27, 2009, with the exception of certain issues for which this Court has extended the discovery deadline in its Orders dated February 25, 2009 (Dkt. 130), March 13, 2009 (Dkt. 142), and March 17, 2009 (Dkt. 147); WHEREAS, the current deadline for motions to compel relating to written discovery served in January 2009 by Abbott Laboratories on GlaxoSmithKline, and by GlaxoSmithKline on Abbott, as set out in the February 25, 2009 Order, is March 20, 2009; WHEREAS, the current deadline for motions relating to Abbott's Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition, as set out in the February 25, 2009 Order, is March 20, 2009; WHEREAS, the current deadline for motions to compel relating to certain enumerated potential deficiencies relating to each parties' production of documents, as set forth in the March 13, 2009 Order, is March 20, 2009. WHEREAS, the current deadline for Abbott to respond to GlaxoSmithKline's Second Set of Requests for Admissions, as set out in the March 17, 2009 Order, is March 20, 2009; WHEREAS, the current deadline for GlaxoSmithKline to move to compel Abbott to provide responses to GlaxoSmithKline's Second Set of Requests for Admissions, as set out in the February 25, 2009 Order, is March 27, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to discuss resolutions to their disputes concerning the discovery referenced herein, and an additional, modest extension will hopefully allow the parties to resolve any disagreements without being forced to seek this Court's intervention; WHEREAS, in light of the Court's March 18, 2009 Order staying this case pending the interlocutory appeal in the related Doe case, a brief extension will not affect the other scheduled dates previously set by this Court (including expert discovery, summary judgment, and trial). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. Abbott will have until April 21, 2009 to respond to GlaxoSmithKline's Second Set of 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP Requests for Admissions or seek relief from the Court regarding those admissions. Any motion seeking relief from responding to GSK's Second Set of Requests for Admissions should be initially filed in the form of a 2-page letter brief before Judge Zimmerman. GlaxoSmithKline then will have 1 STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES CASE NO. C07-5702 (CW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 until April 28, 2009 to file a motion to compel responses to its Second Set of Requests for Admissions. Any such motion likewise should be initially filed in the form of a 2-page letter brief before Judge Zimmerman. 2. Any motion to compel relating to any other written discovery served in January 2009 by Abbott on GlaxoSmithKline, or by GlaxoSmithKline on Abbott, shall be filed by April 28, 2009. 3. Abbott and GlaxoSmithKline have each identified potential deficiencies related to the other parties' production of documents set forth in the enumerated topics contained in Joshua Y. Karp's March 10, 2009 letter and Michael Bhargava's March 10, 2009 letter. In addition, Abbott has requested, and GlaxoSmithKline has agreed to produce, the Expert Report of Joel W. Hay, Ph.D., dated August 19, 2005, and the Supplemental Expert Report of Joel W. Hay, Ph.D., dated August 29, 2005, from prior litigation between GlaxoSmithKline and AIDS Health Foundation (AHF) once AHF completes its redaction of those documents. The parties agree that any motion to compel, or for a protective order, relating to the issues identified in this paragraph shall be filed by April 28, 2009; and that any such motion should be initially filed in the form of a 2-page letter brief before Judge Zimmerman. 4. The parties will continue to work together to attempt to resolve issues concerning 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP Abbott's Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition and to provide mutually convenient dates for that deposition as soon as possible in March or April 2009. GSK reserves the right to file a motion for protective order as to Abbott's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice, and Abbott reserves the right to file a motion to compel on that notice. Any such motion should be initially filed in the form of a 2-page letter brief before Judge Zimmerman on or before April 28, 2009. If GSK files such a motion and Judge Zimmerman allows that deposition to proceed, the parties will work together to provide mutually convenient dates for the GSK witness(es) designated under Rule 30(b)(6) as soon as possible in April or May 2009. 5. Nothing in this stipulation shall expand the parties' rights to seek relief by the Court on any discovery issue, except as set forth herein or in the Court's Orders of February 25, 2009, March 13, 2009, and March 17, 2009. 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES CASE NO. C07-5702 (CW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD: /s/ Trevor S. Stockinger Trevor Stockinger IRELL & MANELLA 1800 Avenue of the Stars Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 Attorney for GSK /s/ Stephanie S. McCallum Stephanie McCallum WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 1700 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007 Attorneys for Defendant Abbott Laboratories PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP 3/20/09 Dated: _______________________ Judge Claudia Wilken United States District Court Northern District of California 3 STIPULATION EXTENDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINES RELATING TO CERTAIN FACT DISCOVERY ISSUES CASE NO. C07-5702 (CW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?