Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Ziilabs Inc., Ltd.

Filing 119

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Ziilabs Inc., Ltd. and Ziilabs Inc., Ltd. terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 David Fink (pro hac vice) FINK & JOHNSON 2 7519 Apache Plume 3 Houston, TX 77071 Telephone: 713-729-4991 4 Facsimile: 713-729-4951 Email: texascowboy6@gmail.com 5 Duncan M. McNeill (Cal. Bar No. 136416) 6 1514 Van Dyke Avenue 7 San Francisco, CA 94124 Telephone: 415-752-5063 8 Email: dmcneill@netzero.net 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter defendant 10 FuzzySharp Technologies, Incorporated 11 Jonathan D. Baker (CA No. 196062) FARNEY DANIELS LLP 800 South Austin Ave., Suite 200 Georgetown, TX 78626 Telephone: 512-582-2840 Facsimile: 512-582-2829 jbaker@farneydaniels.com Michael D. Saunders (CA No. 259692) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 michael.saunders@skadden.com Attorneys for Defendant ZIILABS INC., LTD. f/k/a 3D LABS INC. LTD. 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 ) Case No.: 07-CV-5948-SBA ) ) STIPULATED CONDITIONAL ) DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. Plaintiff, ) AND PROPOSED ORDER ) vs. ) ) ZIILABS INC., LTD., ) ) Defendant. ) 001 Plaintiff FuzzySharp Technologies Inc. (FST) and Defendant ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES 17 INCORPORATED, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (ZiiLabs), through their respective attorneys, hereby file this Stipulated Conditional Dismissal as 25 to ZiiLabs. 26 002 The parties, in good faith, agree and believe that an agreement in principle has been 27 reached, and will be put into written form within thirty (30) days. 28 STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO.: 4:07-cv-05948-SBA 1 003 Therefore, in an effort to minimize judicial resources and to minimize the expenses and 2 costs to the aforementioned parties, it is hereby stipulated that: 3 004 1. This action as to ZiiLabs be conditionally dismissed without prejudice for thirty 4 (30) days from the Order signed by the Court, and FST and ZiiLabs, respectively, will bear its 5 6 own fees and costs. 7 005 2. During the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, either FST and ZiiLabs, may 8 request the Court to reopen the case as to FST and ZiiLabs. 9 006 10 11 3. If, after the expiration of the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, neither FST or ZiiLabs, has submitted a request to reopen to the Court, then it is hereby further stipulated that this case be dismissed with prejudice, and FST and ZiiLabs, will each bear its own fees and 12 13 14 costs. 007 For the foregoing reasons, FST and ZiiLabs, request the Court to accept this Stipulation 15 and proposed Order submitted herewith. 16 Date: May 8, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 17 FINK & JOHNSON 18 /s/ David Fink David Fink 19 20 Attorney for Plaintiff FuzzySharp Technologies Inc. 21 22 23 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM, LLP 24 By: 25 26 27 /s/ Michael D. Saunders MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS Attorney for Defendant ZIILABS INC., LTD. f/k/a 3D LABS INC. LTD. 28 2 STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO.: 4:07-cv-05948-SBA 1 David Fink (pro hac vice) 2 FINK & JOHNSON 3 7519 Apache Plume Houston, TX 77071 4 Telephone: 713-729-4991 Facsimile: 713-729-4951 5 Email: texascowboy6@gmail.com Jonathan D. Baker (CA No. 196062) FARNEY DANIELS LLP 800 South Austin Ave., Suite 200 Georgetown, TX 78626 Telephone: 512-582-2840 Facsimile: 512-582-2829 jbaker@farneydaniels.com 6 Michael D. Saunders (CA No. 259692) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 michael.saunders@skadden.com Duncan M. McNeill (Cal. Bar No. 136416) 7 1514 Van Dyke Avenue San Francisco, CA 94124 8 Telephone: 415-752-5063 Email: dmcneill@netzero.net 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter 10 defendant 11 FuzzySharp Technologies, Incorporated Attorneys for Defendant ZIILABS INC., LTD. f/k/a 3D LABS INC. LTD. 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 21 ZIILABS INC., LTD., 22 Defendant. 23 24 001 Case No.: 07-CV-5948-SBA ORDER FOR STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. The Court has considered the Stipulated Conditional Dismissal as to ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. 25 (ZiiLabs) submitted by FuzzySharp Technologies Inc. (FST) and Orders the following: 26 002 1. This action as to ZiiLabs is conditionally dismissed without prejudice for thirty 27 (30) days from the date of this Order, and FST and ZiiLabs will each bear its own fees and costs. 28 3 STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO.: 4:07-cv-05948-SBA 1 003 2. During the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, either FST or ZiiLabs may 2 request the Court to reopen the case as to FST and ZiiLabs. 3 004 3. After the expiration of the aforementioned thirty (30) day period, if neither FST or 4 ZiiLabs has submitted a request to reopen to the Court, then this case shall be dismissed with 5 6 prejudice, and FST and ZiiLabs will each bear its own fees and costs. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 10 Date:5/10/12 ____________________________ Saundra B. Armstrong U.S. District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO.: 4:07-cv-05948-SBA 1 FILER’S ATTESTATION: PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 2 Pursuant to General Order no. 45, Section X(B), David Fink hereby attests that 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 4 5 6 Date: May 8, 2012 /S/ David Fink David Fink 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ZIILABS INC., LTD. AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO.: 4:07-cv-05948-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?