Goldstein v. Sillen
Filing
144
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 135 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting 140 Motion FOR CLARIFICATION (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010)
Goldstein v. Sillen
Doc. 144
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRYL L. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SILLEN, ET AL., et al., Defendants. /
No. C 07-05958 SBA (PR) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS SILLEN'S AND RUSSELL'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS DAVID'S AND WILSON'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2010, Defendants Sillen and Russell filed a motion for summary judgment. On September 7, 2010, Plaintiff filed a document entitled, "Motion to Strike the Declaration of Dr. Elena Tootle," which the Court construes as a document in support of his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Before the Court is Defendants Sillen's and Russell's motion entitled, "Motion for Administrative Relief; Request for Clarification Concerning Briefing With Respect to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Dr. Elena Tootell." Defendants "propose that the Court permit [them] to refrain from responding to Plaintiff' Motion to Strike until after October 8, 2010, in the event Plaintiff intends to file a separate or more complete opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment." (Defs.' Mot. at 2.) Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants Sillen's and Russell's motion. Plaintiff may file a more complete opposition no later than October 8, 2010. The time in which Defendants Sillen and Russell may file their reply will be up to and including November 8, 2010. Also before the Court is Defendants David's and Wilson's motion for an extension of time to file a dispositive motion. Having read and considered Defendants David's and Wilson's request for an extension of time and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS their request. The time in which Defendants David and Wilson may file their motion for summary judgment will be extended up to and including November 23, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants David and Wilson no later than thirty (30) days from
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
the date their motion is filed. Defendants David and Wilson shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed. This Order terminates Docket nos. 135 and 140. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/23/10
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.07\Goldstein5958.grantCLARIFICATION&EOT.wpd 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRYL L. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SILLEN, ET AL. et al, Defendant. /
Case Number: CV07-05958 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 23, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Darryl Lee Goldstein P-79097 California State Prison - San Quentin San Quentin, CA 94964 Dated: September 23, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\CR.07\Goldstein5958.grantCLARIFICATION&EOT.wpd 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?