Metro Fuel LLC v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 119

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 118 Case Management Statement filed by City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/2/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PAUL E. FISHER, State Bar #125309 The Law Offices of Paul E. Fisher 3101 W. Coast Highway, Suite 311 Newport Beach CA 92663 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] ERIC HECKER (admitted pro hac vice) Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor New York, NY 10019 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff METRO FUEL LLC DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney KRISTEN A. JENSEN, State Bar #130196 THOMAS S. LAKRITZ, State Bar #161234 VICTORIA WONG, State Bar #214289 Deputy City Attorneys City Hall, Room 234 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA METRO FUEL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a subdivision of the State of California, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a chartered California city and county and DOE 1 through DOE 10, Defendants.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT USDC No. C07-6067 PJH

Case No. C07-6067 PJH The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Hearing Date: Time: November 12, 2009 2:30 P.M.

1

n:\land\li2009\080804\00587207.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties in this action hereby submit this Joint Case Management Statement and advise the Court as follows: 1. On or about April 16, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc in the Metro Lights case. 2. Metro Fuel (which is the successor in interest to Metro Lights) filed its petition

for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in the Metro Lights case on August 31, 2009. 3. Los Angeles's response to Metro Fuel's petition for certiorari in the Metro

Lights case is now due on November 16, 2009. 4. in January 2010. 5. The parties hereby jointly recommend and request that the Case Management The parties expect that the United States Supreme Court will act on the petition

Conference presently scheduled for November 12, 2009, be continued until February 11, 2010, at 2:00 2:30 p.m., with a Joint Case Management Statement to be filed on or before January 28, 2010. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT USDC No. C07-6067 PJH

2

n:\land\li2009\080804\00587207.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
UNIT ED

6.

The continuance shall not preclude the parties from filing a motion before the

Case Management Conference. Dated: October 29, 2009 EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP

By:_

/S/ ERIC HECKER

.

Attorneys for Plaintiff METRO FUEL LLC. Dated: October 29, 2009 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney KRISTEN A. JENSEN THOMAS S. LAKRITZ VICTORIA WONG Deputy City Attorneys

By:

/S/ THOMAS S. LAKRITZ

.

Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The Case Management Conference Statement of the parties is hereby adopted by the Court as the Case Management Order for the case and the parties are ordered to comply with this Order. The Court further orders:

S

24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED: 11/2/09 Dated:______________________ By:

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

yllis J. HONORABLE JPHYLLIS J. HAMILTON udge Ph United States District Court Judge ER C

N

F D IS T IC T O R

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT USDC No. C07-6067 PJH

3

n:\land\li2009\080804\00587207.doc

A

LI

FO

Hamilto

RT U O
n

.

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 29, 2009

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION (U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. General Order 45, Section X.B)

I obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from each other signatory, or from the single signatory, in compliance with U.S.D.C. N.D. General Order 45, Section X.B.

DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney KRISTEN A. JENSEN THOMAS S. LAKRITZ VICTORIA WONG Deputy City Attorneys By: /S/ THOMAS S. LAKRITZ Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT USDC No. C07-6067 PJH

4

n:\land\li2009\080804\00587207.doc