Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P. et al

Filing 103

PROPOSED INJUNCTION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. and SPRINT
SPECTRUM REALTY CO.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9

PROPOSED
INJUNCTION

v.

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. C 08-0342 CW
No. C 11-0056 CW

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al.,

11

Defendants.
________________________________/

12
13

Plaintiffs Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Sprint Spectrum Realty

14

Company, L.P. (collectively, Sprint) brought these related actions

15

under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA), 47 U.S.C. § 332,

16

against Defendants County of San Mateo and its Board of

17

Supervisors.

18

motions for partial summary judgment in both actions.

On December 4, 2013, this Court granted Sprint’s

19

Accordingly, the Court hereby orders Defendants to approve

20

Sprint’s application for a use permit under section 6500 of the

21

San Mateo County Zoning Regulations to continue operating its

22

telecommunications facility at 1175 Palomar Drive, Redwood City,

23

California.

24

have an effective issuance date of September 15, 2009, and an

25

expiration date of September 15, 2019, pursuant to the

26

recommendations in the Board of Supervisors’ August 2009 staff

27

report.

28

The use permit, which shall apply retroactively, will

See Case No. 11-0056, Docket No. 32-15, at AR 658.

1

Nothing in this order shall preclude the County from

2

requiring Sprint to comply with applicable safety provisions set

3

forth in the County’s Building, Electrical, and Fire Codes.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated:

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2