Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P. et al

Filing 54

ORDER granting re 53 Stipulation Continuing Briefing Dates, Dispositive Motion Hearing Date, And Date For Follow-Up CMC, filed by Rose Gibson, Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo, Adrienne Tissier, Mark Church, Rich Gordon, Jerry Hill, County of San Mateo Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2009 02:00 PM. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2009 02:00 PM. Opening brief by Sprint due 10/30/09. Opposition / cross motions by County by 11/13/09. Reply/opposition by Sprint due 12/1/09. Reply by County by 12/10/09.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/14/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL P. MURPHY, COUNTY COUNSEL (SBN 83887) By: Timothy Fox, Deputy (SBN 190084) Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 363-4456 Facsimile: (650) 363-4034 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SAN MATEO et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., a Delaware limited partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, its governing body; MARK CHURCH, in his official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo; JERRY HILL, in his official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo; RICH GORDON, in his official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for the of the County of San Mateo; ROSE GIBSON, in her official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo; ADRIENNE TISSIER, in her official capacity as Board Member of the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Mateo; and DOES 1-10, inclusive. Defendants. Case No. C 08-00342 CW Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING DATES, DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE, AND DATE FOR FOLLOW-UP CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [ PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING DATES, DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE, AND DATE FOR FOLLOW-UP CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court continues the briefing dates for a dispositive motion as follows: October 30, 2009 as the deadline for Sprint to file an opening brief, November 13, 2009 as the deadline for the County to file an opposition and any cross motion, December 1, 2009 as the deadline for Sprint to file a reply/opposition to cross motion (if any), and December 10, 2009 as the deadline for the County to file a reply on the cross-motion (if any). Further, the Court continues the follow-up case management conference to December 17, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. September 14, 2009 Dated: ______________________ S S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING DATES, DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE, AND DATE FOR FOLLOW-UP CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE A \\cco-fp\Shared\LITIGATE\S_CASES\Sprint Spectrum L.P\Pleadings\sprint spectrum stip 08052009.doc ER C LI FO R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D Hon. CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge en ia Wilk e Claud Judg RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?