Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P. et al

Filing 84

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION, DOCKET NO. 83, AND SETTING DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on August 3, 2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6
7

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM
REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 08-00342 CW
ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATION, Docket
No. 83, and SETTING
DEADLINES

v.
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

11

/

12
13
14
15

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM
REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership,

16
17
18
19

No. C 11-00056 CW

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
/

20
21
22

On July 20, 2011, the parties in the present action submitted

23

a stipulation to continue dates set at a case management

24

conference.

25

case to continue.

26

Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. County of San Mateo, et al., C 11-00056

27

CW, which is related to this action, C 08-00342 CW, but not

28

consolidated with it.

Docket No. 83.

There are no pending dates in this

The dates counsel seek to reset were set in

The present action, C 08-00342 CW, was

1

consolidated with Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. County of San Mateo, C

2

09-05022 CW, but that case was administratively closed on October

3

28, 2009.

4

The same deadlines shall apply to this action and Sprint

5

Spectrum, L.P. v. County of San Mateo, et al., C 11-00056 CW.

6

Accordingly, for both cases, as the parties have requested in their

7

stipulation, discovery cutoff is set for October 24, 2011.

8

Plaintiff’s opening brief for any case-dispositive motion is due by

9

December 5, 2011.

Defendants’ opposition and any cross-motion,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

contained within a single brief, are due December 19, 2011.

11

Plaintiff’s reply and opposition to any cross-motion, contained in

12

a single brief, are due January 6, 2012.

13

January 16, 2012.

14

held on Thursday, January 31, 2012 at 2:00 pm, whether or not

15

dispositive motions are filed.

16
17

A further case management conference will be

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated August 3, 2011

18

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants’ reply is due

2