Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Sprint Spectrum Realty Company L.P. et al

Filing 87

ORDER Granting (38 in 4:11-cv-00056-CW) Stipulation to Continue Dates. Discovery due by 2/21/2012. Motions due by 4/2/2012. Opposition/Cross Motions due by 4/16/2012. Replies due by 4/30/2012. Replies due by 5/9/2012. Case Management Statement due by 5/10/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2012 02:00 PM. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/12/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

JOHN J. FLYNN III (SBN 76419)
BENJAMIN Z. RUBIN (SBN 249630)
NOSSAMAN LLP
18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800
Irvine, California 92612-0177
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.; SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY
COMPANY, L.P.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. C 11-00056 CW
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership; SPRINT SPECTRUM
[Related to Case No. C 08-00342 CW]
REALTY COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership,
Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE CONTINUING DATES

vs.
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF
SAN MATEO, its governing body; MARK
CHURCH, in his official capacity as Board
Member of the Board of Supervisors for
the County of San Mateo; JERRY HILL, in
his official capacity as Board Member of
the Board of Supervisors for the County of
San Mateo; RICH GORDON, in his
official capacity as Board Member of the
Board of Supervisors for the of the County
of San Mateo; ROSE GIBSON, in her
official capacity as Board Member of the
Board of Supervisors for the County of San
Mateo; ADRIENNE TISSIER, in her
official capacity as Board Member of the
Board of Supervisors for the County of San
Mateo; and DOES 1-10, inclusive.
-1-

ORDER RE CONTINUING DATES

Defendants.

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court continues the October 24, 2011
discovery cutoff to February 21, 2012; the December 5, 2011 deadline for Sprint’s
opening brief to April 2, 2012; the December 19, 2011 deadline for County’s
opposition/cross motion (contained within a single brief) to April 16, 2012; the January 6,
2012 deadline for Sprint’s reply/opposition to cross motion (contained within a single
brief) to April 30, 2012; the January 16, 2012 deadline for County’s reply to May
9, 2012; motions will be heard on Thursday, May 24, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.; and the
further case management conference currently set for January 31, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. to
May 24, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. Further, these same deadlines shall apply to this action and
Sprint Spectrum, L.P., et al. v. County of San Mateo, et al., Case No. 08-00342 CW.
Dated:

9/12/2011

Hon. CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

-2-

ORDER RE CONTINUING DATES