Bonilla v. Ayers

Filing 11

ORDER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/26/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)

Download PDF
Bonilla v. Ayers Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner Steven Bonilla has been sentenced to death by the Superior Court of California for the County of Alameda. Although Steven W. BONILLA, Petitioner, v. Vincent CULLEN, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case Number 08-0471 CW DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER his state habeas case is currently being litigated, he has filed a "protective petition" in this Court pursuant to Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408 (2005). Pursuant to Habeas Local Rule 2254-25, this Court earlier granted his request for appointment of counsel and referred this action to the Northern District's Selection Board for the recommendation of qualified counsel to represent Petitioner in these proceedings. Pursuant to Habeas Local Rule 2254-24(a), Petitioner's concurrent request for a stay of execution was also Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 granted. On July 15, 2010, Petitioner filed a pro se pleading containing numerous requests and motions. Per an order filed July 22, 2010, all of Petitioner's requests and motions were DENIED. On July 23, 2010, Petitioner filed another pro se pleading, this one "[r]equesting clarification by the federal court on the affect that 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c) and (d) had on a person's 4th Amendment Right to privacy in their telephone toll records." Petitioner also notified the Court of what he claims is a violation of his constitutional rights with regards to the gathering of certain evidence used in his criminal trial. As were various issues in Petitioner's pleading of July 15, 2010, these issues are not ripe for this Court to consider. Among other things, Petitioner's state habeas matter is still pending in the state court. Thus, the Court DENIES Petitioner's requests in full, including his request for discovery and his request for a hearing. For the foregoing reasons, all of Petitioner's requests and motions contained in his pleading of July 22, 2010 are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:7/26/2010 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVEN W. BONILLA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: CV08-00471 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ROBERT AYERS JR. et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on July 26, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. California Appellate Project Federal Court Docketing 101 Second Street Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Habeas Corpus Resource Center 303 Second Street, Suite 400 South San Francisco, CA 94107 Steven W. Bonilla J-48500 CSP-San Quentin CA State Prison at San Quentin San Quentin, CA 94974 Dated: July 26, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?