Vaovasa et al v. SFO Good-Nite Inn, LLC

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the deadline for any party to move reopen the case is extended until 02/27/09, re 53 Order Dismissing Case. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 2/17/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009) Modified on 2/18/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

D. SCOTT CHANG # 146403 REED N. COLFAX, Pro Hac Vice JOHN P. RELMAN, Pro Hac Vice RELMAN & DANE PLLC 1225 Nineteenth St., N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID M. KING # 95279 JEREMY A. BURNS # 239917 CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMSPON, & HORN Professional Law Corporation 216 Park Road P.O. Box 513 Burlingame, CA 94011-0513 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant SFO Good-Nite Inn LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Oakland Division ) SIAUPIA VAOVASA; ELISAPETA VAOVASA; and LEALOFI ) PENITITO, individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) SFO GOOD-NITE INN, LLC, a California ) limited liability company; ) ) Defendant. ) Case No. C 08-1171-SBA STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REOPEN CASE BEFORE DISMISSAL BECOMES FINAL; ORDER Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

1

Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reopen Case; [Proposed] Order Case No. C 08-1171-SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby jointly apply for and stipulate to an extension of twelve (12) days, up to and including February 27, 2009, for the parties to move to reopen the case before dismissal becomes final. There is good cause to grant the parties' joint application and stipulation. On December 15, 2009, the Court issued an order conditionally dismissing the case. The Court's order stated that the case was dismissed with prejudice except that either party could move to reopen the case if settlement is not reached provided a motion is filed within 60 days of the Order. The parties are in the process of obtaining the final signatures on the settlement agreement and release. The settlement agreement and release requires the signatures of more than 20 persons, including many persons located outside the continental United States. The parties therefore apply for and stipulate to a brief extension of time of the deadline to move to reopen the case before the dismissal becomes final to allow the parties to obtain the remaining signatures. // // //

Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reopen Case; [Proposed] Order Case No. C 08-1171-SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: February 13, 2009 Respectfully submitted, __/S/ D. SCOTT CHANG_________ D. SCOTT CHANG # 146403 REED N. COLFAX, Pro Hac Vice RELMAN & DANE PLLC 1225 Nineteenth St., N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 Attorneys for Plaintiffs __/S/ DAVID M. KING___________ DAVID M. KING, Esq. # 95279 JEREMY A. BURNS, Esq. # 239917 CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMSPON, & HORN Professional Law Corporation 216 Park Road P.O. Box 513 Burlingame, CA 94011-0513 Attorneys for Defendant SFO Good-Nite Inn LLC

ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the deadline for any party to move reopen the case is extended until February 27, 2009. Dated: February 17, 2009

____________________________________ Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge

3

Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reopen Case; [Proposed] Order Case No. C 08-1171-SBA