Garner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
172
ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE re 171 Letter filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/15/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2009)
Case 4:08-cv-01365-CW
Document 171
Filed 05/15/2009
www.sdma.com
Page 1 of 1
phone
415.781.2635
O N E MA R K E T PL A Z A
S T E U A R T TOW E R , 8 T H F L O O R
SA N FRA N C I S C O , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 1 0 5 41 5 . 7 8 1 . 7 9 0 0
fax
May 15, 2009 E-FILED Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Court Courtroom C 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Request for Phone Appearance for Katherine Armstrong 212.735.2954 Arnesha M. Garner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company United States District Court-Northern District Case No. CV 08 1365 CW (EMC) Motion Hearing Re Protective Order: May 27, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. Judge Edward M. Chen Courtroom C
Dear Judge Chen: We represent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in the above-entitled matter. This letter is to request that Katherine Armstrong, admitted pro hac vice in this matter, be allowed to appear by telephone at the hearing regarding the motion for protective order as to policyholder identifying information scheduled for May 27, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. Local counsel will be present at the hearing. We would appreciate it if you could have your clerk inform us whether the phone appearance is granted. Thank you for considering our request. Very truly yours, /s/ Laura Goodman Laura L. Goodman Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP
IT IS SO ORDERED that defense counsel Katherine Armstrong is allowed to appear by telephone. Court will call Ms. Armstrong at (212) 732-2954 on 5/27/09 between 10:30 ISTRIC ES D a.m. to 12:00 p.m. TC AT ____________________ ERED O ORD IT IS S Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge . Chen
Judge E dward M
UNIT ED
S
T
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
SF/1599321v1
ER
C
LI
FO
R NIA
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?