SuccessFactors, Inc. v. Softscape, Inc.

Filing 246

ORDER re 245 GRANTING STIPULATION to File Amended Pleadings. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 10/6/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CSB NO. 115163) lpulgram@fenwick.com LIWEN A. MAH (CSB NO. 239033) lmah@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB NO. 184915) ppremo@fenwick.com HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III (CSB No. 237951) hcarbajal@fenwick.com DENNIS FAIGAL (CSB NO. 252829) dfaigal@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SUCCESSFACTORS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. SOFTSCAPE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. /// /// /// /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS 1 CASE NO.: CV 08 1376 CW (BZ) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV 08 1376 CW (BZ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS Complaint Filed: March 11, 2008 Trial Date: June 1, 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. and Defendant Softscape, Inc., through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff SuccessFactors may file an Amended or Supplemental Complaint, and that Defendant Softscape may file an Amended Answer and Counterclaim. The parties have agreed to exchange the proposed amended pleadings by October 3, 2008, which is the current deadline to file the amended pleadings. They have further agreed that they will file the amended pleadings with the Court by October 7, 2008. The parties jointly petition the Court for leave to file the amended pleadings by October 7, 2008 and further request that each side be permitted up to fifteen (15) court days to respond to the amended or supplemental pleadings. By October 7, 2008, the parties also agree to submit a stipulation to propose modifications to the existing pretrial and trial schedule. To date, the parties have requested only one prior 30-day extension of time to amend the pleadings (see Dkt. No. 213), but have not otherwise sought any extensions of time for any other pretrial or trial deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order entered July 1, 2008 (see Dkt. No. 150). IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 3, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP BY: Dated: October 3, 2008 /s/ Patrick E. Premo Attorneys For Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, PC By: /s/ Bryan Sinclair Attorneys For Defendant SOFTSCAPE, INC. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS 2 CASE NO.: CV 08 1376 CW (BZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. Dated: October 3, 2008 FENWICK & WEST LLP BY: /s/ Patrick E. Premo Attorneys For Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS 3 CASE NO.: CV 08 1376 CW (BZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW M O U N T A I N VI E W ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/6 Dated: , 2008 The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge 1292390 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PLEADINGS 4 CASE NO.: CV 08 1376 CW (BZ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?