Western Watersheds Project et al v. U.S. Forest Service

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. re 81 Stipulation, filed by Los Padres Forest Watch, Red Rock Forests, Natural Resources Defense Council, Grand Canyon Trust, Environmental Protection Information Center, Utah Environment al Congress, Western Watersheds Project, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Forest Legacy, Oregon Natural Desert Association, California Trout, Sequoia Forestkeeper. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/9/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY R. CHANIN (CSB # 103649) WARREN A. BRAUNIG (CSB # 243884) KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Email: jchanin@kvn.com wbraunig@kvn.com LAUREN M. RULE (ISB # 6863), pro hac vice ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST P.O. Box 1612 Boise, ID 83701 Telephone: (208) 342-7024 Facsimile: (208) 342-8286 Email: lrule@advocateswest.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT; NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA TROUT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER; KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER; LOS PADRES FOREST WATCH; SIERRA FOREST LEGACY; SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER; GRAND CANYON TRUST; UTAH ENVIRONMENTAL CONGRESS; RED ROCK FORESTS; and OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING JANUARY 15, 2009 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 433786.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby make a stipulated request to vacate the currently scheduled January 15, 2009 Case Management Conference. As set forth in the accompanying Joint Case Management Conference Statement and Motion to Vacate January 15, 2009 Case Management Conference, the parties have set a schedule for continuing settlement discussions in this matter, with another mediated settlement conference to occur on April 16, 2009. The parties therefore request that the Court reset the Case Management Conference to a date subsequent to the April 16, 2009 settlement conference. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated January 8, 2009 FOR PLAINTIFFS By: /s/ Warren A. Braunig JEFFREY R. CHANIN WARREN A. BRAUNIG KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Dated January 8, 2009 FOR DEFENDANT By: /s/ David B. Glazer DAVID B. GLAZER Natural Resources Section Environmental and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, CA 94105 Concurrence obtained per General Order 45 X.B. 433786.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 4/30/09. 1/9/09 Dated:________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for January 15, 2009 at 2:30 p.m., is vacated. The Court will reschedule the Case Management Conference for a date after the April 16, 2009 settlement conference. UNIT ED HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE S S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________ TA J ER N D IS T IC T R OF 433786.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH A C LI FO yllis J. udge Ph Hamilto n R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?