Western Watersheds Project et al v. U.S. Forest Service

Filing 97

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 96 Stipulation,, filed by Los Padres Forest Watch, Red Rock Forests, Natural Resources Defense Council, Grand Canyon Trust, Environmental Protection Information Center, Utah Environment al Congress, Western Watersheds Project, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Forest Legacy, Oregon Natural Desert Association, California Trout, Sequoia Forestkeeper. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/2/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFFREY R. CHANIN (CSB # 103649) WARREN A. BRAUNIG (CSB # 243884) KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Email: jchanin@kvn.com wbraunig@kvn.com LAUREN M. RULE (ISB # 6863), pro hac vice ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST P.O. Box 1612 Boise, ID 83701 Telephone: (208) 342-7024 Facsimile: (208) 342-8286 Email: lrule@advocateswest.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT; NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL; CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA TROUT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER; KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER; LOS PADRES FOREST WATCH; SIERRA FOREST LEGACY; SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER; GRAND CANYON TRUST; UTAH ENVIRONMENTAL CONGRESS; RED ROCK FORESTS; and OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 4, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 466502.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 4, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby make a stipulated request to vacate the currently scheduled February 4, 2010 Case Management Conference. The parties are engaged in ongoing settlement negotiations that are moving forward but not yet complete. The parties therefore request that the Court reset the Case Management Conference to April 8, 2010 or the Court's first available date after April 16. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated January 28, 2010 By: FOR PLAINTIFFS /s/ Warren A. Braunig JEFFREY R. CHANIN WARREN A. BRAUNIG KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Dated January 28, 2010 By: FOR DEFENDANT /s/ David B. Glazer DAVID B. GLAZER Natural Resources Section Environmental and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, CA 94105 Concurrence obtained per General Order 45 X.B. 466502.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 4, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for February 4, 2010 at 2:30 p.m., is vacated. The Court will reschedule the Case Management April 8 Conference for ____________________________, 2010. UNIT ED 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIS IS THE LAST CONTINUANCE WITHOUT AN APPEARANCE. PARTIES MUST FILE A JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT AND APPEAR AT THE 4/8/10 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. 2/2/10 Dated:________________ S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF 466502.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 4, 2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No.: C 08-01460 PJH A C LI FO DERE _____________________________ SO OR IT IS HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE n Hamilto hyllis J. Judge P NO D R NIA RT U O RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?