Ezike v. Mittal et al

Filing 87

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING 78 Motion for Relief Allowing Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Waiver of Fee. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009) Modified on 4/7/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
For the Northern District of California United States District Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMEO EZIKE,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LAKSHMI MITTAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

Case No. 4:08-cv-01867-SBA ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF ALLOWING ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE AND WAIVING FEE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Peter C. Koch, an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, whose business address and telephone number are 100 W. Randolph Street, Floor 13, Chicago, IL 60601; [phone], having moved pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-11 for administrative relief allowing admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis in the above-entitled action on behalf of certain Illinois State defendants, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3(a)(1) & (2). All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filings. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that a member of the bar of this Court need not serve as co-counsel for the purpose of the Illinois State defendants contesting personal jurisdiction and that Counsel may appear for purposes contesting personal jurisdiction of the Court over the Illinois State defendants. Furthermore, the usual application fee for appearing pro hac vice is waived. Dated: 4/6/09 United State District Judge