White v. Greenwich Investors XXVI, LLC et al
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/12/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 BABATUNDE M. WHITE,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
Case No: C 08-2013 SBA
ORDER
vs.
9 GREENWICH INVESTORS XXVI, LLC,
10
Defendant.
11
12
On September 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why the
13
instant action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the
14
Court’s prior order and for failure to prosecute. Dkt. 14. A case management conference
15
had been scheduled for September 11, 2008. However, the parties failed to file a joint case
16
management statement, Plaintiff failed to initiate the case management conference call and
17
neither party appeared for the conference. Based on these actions, the Court issued its OSC
18
ordering the parties to appear on October 16, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. to show cause why the
19
action should not be dismissed and ordering Plaintiff to file a Certificate of Plaintiff ten
20
days prior to the hearing to explain why the case should not be dismissed. The parties were
21
warned that the failure to comply with the OSC would result in dismissal of the action
22
without prejudice. Plaintiff did not file the Certificate of Plaintiff and the parties did not
23
appear at the hearing. To date, neither party has contacted the Court.
24
A district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to
25
comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Link v.
26
Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 633 (1962); McKeever v. Block, 932 F.2d 795, 797 (9th Cir.
27
1991). The court should consider five factors before dismissing an action under Rule
28
41(b): (1) the public interest in the expeditious resolution of the litigation: (2) the court’s
1
need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the availability of
2
less drastic sanctions; and (5) the public policy favoring the disposition of actions on their
3
merits. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995).
4
The first three factors cited above weigh in favor of dismissal in light of the fact that
5
Plaintiff has not pursued this matter for nearly three years in any fashion whatsoever. The
6
fourth factor also weighs in favor of dismissal because less drastic sanctions would have
7
little impact in light of the Court’s prior warning that the failure to comply with its OSC
8
would result in the dismissal of the action. Although the fifth factor appears to weigh
9
against dismissal, dismissal is appropriate in light of the other four factors. See Pagtalunan
10
v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002) (finding district court did not abuse its
11
discretion in dismissing petition with prejudice where three of the five factors weighed in
12
favor of dismissal). In light of the foregoing,
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
14
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
15
The Clerk of the Court shall close the file and terminate any pending matters.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: August 12, 2011
_____________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
WHITE et al,
4
Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
GREENWICH INVESTORS XXVI, LLC et al,
7
Defendant.
/
8
9
Case Number: CV08-02013 SBA
10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
11
12
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
13
14
15
That on August 12, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
19
Babatunde White
1644 Cipriani Place
Brentwood, CA 94513
20
Dated: August 12, 2011
21
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?