Pirog v. Astrue

Filing 28

BRIEFING ORDER: That Plaintiff shall file any oppositions by 02/10/09; and Defendant shall file any replies by 02/24/09, re 22 Motion for Reconsideration for Relief from Order. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 1/20/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2009) Modified on 1/22/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN B. PIROG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION No. C 08-02093 SBA No. C 08-02094 SBA ORDER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Before the Court is defendant's Motion for Relief from Order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) [Docket Nos. 22 in 08-02093 & 18 in 08-02094]. Defendant seeks to vacate the Court's Orders denying defendant's motion to dismiss, entered on November 7, 2008. See id. On December 10, 2008, the Court set a briefing schedule for defendant's Rule 60 motion. See Docket Nos. 24 in 0802093 & 20 in 08-02094. Plaintiff had until December 23, 2008 to file an opposition, if any, and defendant had until January 6, 2009 to file a reply, if any. See id. On December 15, 2008, for reasons unknown, plaintiff filed a request for a "continuance" to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss. See Docket Nos. 25 in 08-02093 & 21 in 08-02094. Plaintiff stated that he was in Iowa assisting his mother due to his father's recent passing. Id. Plaintiff provided a mailing address in Greenbrae, California. See id. On January 7, 2009, the Court's Order setting a briefing schedule was returned as undeliverable due to the forwarding time having expired. See Docket Nos. 26 in 0802093 & 22 in 08-02094. On January 8, 2009, still in Iowa, plaintiff filed another request for a "continuance," and provided a new Iowa address. See Docket Nos. 27 in 08-02093 & 23 in 0802094. Given plaintiff's circumstances, his pro per status, and his timely contacts with the Court indicating a desire to prosecute this matter, the Court sets the following briefing schedule. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a copy of defendant's Motion for Relief from Order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) and any attached papers or proposed orders. Plaintiff shall file any opposition to this motion on or before February 10, 2009. Defendant shall file any reply on or before 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 February 24, 2009. The Court shall consider the matter submitted on the pleadings. The Court advises plaintiff that under Civil Local Rule 3-9(a) he is expected to comply with all local rules, and that under Civil Local Rule 3-11 he must keep the Court timely apprised of any changes in address. The Court also cautions that under paragraph 8 of the Court's Standing Order for Civil Cases his failure to oppose a motion will constitute consent to granting it. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 20, 2009 _________________________________ Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PIROG et al, Plaintiff, v. ASTRUE et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV08-02093 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on January 21, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. John B. Pirog 2626 So. Mulbeny Street Sioux City, IA 51106 Dated: January 21, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?