Badwi v. Evans et al

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 88 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Ramzi Ahmed Badwi, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 88 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Replies due by 2/24/2012.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 COOLEY LLP JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA (220934) (jsantamaria@cooley.com) JENNIFER A. BROWN (267836) (jbrown@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 6 7 8 9 COOLEY LLP KATHLYN A. QUERUBIN (275085) (kquerubin@cooley.com) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Telephone: (415) 693-2000 Facsimile: (415) 693-2222 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ramzi Ahmed Badwi 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 Ramzi Ahmed Badwi, Case No. No. C 08-02221 SBA (NJV) 16 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 Warden Anthony Hedgpeth, et al., Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong 21 Defendants. 22 WHEREAS, through its October 27, 2011 Civil Case Management Conference 23 24 Minutes, the Court set the last day to amend pleadings or add parties as January 25, 2012, 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ramzi Ahmed Badwi filed a Motion Seeking Leave to File a 26 Second Amended complaint with an accompanying Second Amended Complaint on January 25, 27 2012, 28 WHEREAS, Defendants Anthony Hedpeth and Lieutenant Oyarzabal filed an Oppostion COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 1. STIPULATION REGRADING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAC NO. C 08-02221 SBA (NJV) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint on February 8, 2012, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ opposition must be served and filed no later than February 15, 2012, WHEREAS, the motion hearing for the Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is set for May 1, 2012, WHEREAS, the parties conferred and agreed that Plaintiff could serve and file the reply to Defendants’ opposition no later than February 24, 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, through undersigned counsel of record as follows: Subject to the consent of the Court, the last day to serve and file the reply to Defendants’ opposition is February 24, 2012. 12 13 Dated: February 9, 2012 Respectfully submitted, COOLEY LLP JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA JENNIFER A. BROWN KATHLYN A. QUERUBIN 14 15 16 /s/ Jennifer A.W. Brown JENNIFER A.W. BROWN Attorneys for Plaintiff Ramzi Ahmed Badwi 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: February 9, 2012 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California WILLIAM C. KWONG Supervising Deputy Attorney General 23 24 25 26 /s/Sharon Anne Garske SHARON ANNE GARSKE Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Hedgpeth and Oyarzabal 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 2. STIPULATION REGRADING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAC NO. C 08-02221 SBA (NJV) 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: February 10, 2012 The Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 1006844 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 3. STIPULATION REGRADING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY ISO MTN FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAC NO. C 08-02221 SBA (NJV)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?