Wright v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 21 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Respondent's Answer due 12/04/09. Petitioner's Traverse due within (30) thirty-days of receipt of Answer (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009) Modified on 10/23/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order (C 08-02228 SBA (PR)) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL J. WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. JAMES YATES, Warden, Respondent. Case No. C 08-02228 SBA (PR) ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until December 4, 2009, to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of his receipt of the answer. Dated: 10/19/09 __________________________ The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL J WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. A HEDGPETH et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV08-02228 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 10/22/09October 22, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Michael J. Wright V-91600 Pleasant Valley State Prison 24863 W. Jayne Ave. P.O. Box 8503 Coalinga, CA 93210-8503 Dated: 10/22/09October 22, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 2 [Proposed] Order (C 08-02228 SBA (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?