Ferreira v. Chabot College et al
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/25/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 08-02264 CW CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
RICHARD FERREIRA, Plaintiff, v. CHABOT COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. /
CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard Ferreira 18349 Robscott Avenue Hayward, CA 94541 Dated: February 25, 2009 FERREIRA et al, Plaintiff, v. CHABOT COLLEGE et al, Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV08-02264 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on February 25, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?