Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Netgear, Inc. et al
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING MEDIATION re 40 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Netgear, Inc., Rayspan Corporation, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/15/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
Clear Form
CASE NO. 08-02310 PJH Plaintiff(s), v.
NETGEAR, Inc. and Rayspan Corporation
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________
O _ _ 2008 Dated:__ct._6,______
/ _ Robert Yorio _s/ __________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff Ruckus Wireless, / _ David __ Barkan _s/ _____M. ___________________ Attorney for Defendant NETGEAR, Inc.
and Defendant Rayspan Corporation
Inc.
O _ _ 2008 Dated:__ct._6,_______
E When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket vent, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation x 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
10/15/ _ Dated:_____08__________
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
Declaration Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert Yorio.
Dated: October 6, 2008
Fish & Richardson P.C. /s/David M. Barkan David M. Barkan Attorneys for NETGEAR, Inc. and Rayspan Corporation
A
C
LI
FO
___________________________________ amilton yllis J. H hDISTRICT UNITED STATES JUDGE Judge P
R NIA
O OR IT IS S
DERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?