Brown v. Stroud et al
Filing
660
ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/19/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
STEVEN AMES BROWN, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 08-02348 JSW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT
ANDREW B. STROUD, et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
16
Now before the Court is the Motion to Amend Judgment, filed by the Estate of Nina
17
Simone (“Simone Estate”). On October 21, 2014, the Court denied the Simone Estate’s motion
18
to amend to add Andy Stroud, Inc. (“ASI”) as a judgment debtor, reserved ruling on the Simone
19
Estate’s request to amend the judgment to receive an award of monetary damages, and granted
20
the Simone Estate’s request to amend the judgment to reflect the accurate representative of the
21
Simone Estate and address of the Simone Estate’s counsel. (ECF No. 642.) In that Order, the
22
Court invited the Simone Estate to move again to add ASI as a judgment debtor with more
23
supporting evidence, and directed the Simone Estate to clarify whether it was relinquishing its
24
rights to physical possession of any Nina Simone recordings for which it was awarded monetary
25
damages. (Id. at 4.)
26
In its response to the Court’s Order, the Simone Estate does not address the issue of
27
adding ASI as a judgment debtor, and does not provide any further evidence in support. The
28
Court’s ruling on this issue is therefore unchanged.
1
However, with respect to the Court’s Order that the Simone Estate clarify its position
2
regarding its rights to physical possession of any Nina Simone recordings for which it was
3
awarded monetary damages, the Simone Estate has clarified that it does not seek double
4
recovery.
5
The Simone Estate first proposes the following language be added to the judgment:
6
Should physical possession of any of the following boxes of Nina
Simone original audio recordings identified in the September 11,
2005 appraisal from ICU Ent. Dist. (Document 626-1) be
delivered by any of the Stroud Parties to the Simone Estate (1-9,
11-15, 30-33, 36A, 36B, 37-48, 50, 51, 51A, 52-55, 61-63, 65-79,
82, 85 or 86), the damages owing by the Stroud Parties to the
Simone Estate hereunder shall be credited at the rate of
$1,875,000.00 for each such identified box of recordings, first to
any outstanding accrued interest and next to any outstanding
principal. Should the cumulative credits for such returned original
recordings exceed the outstanding unpaid accrued interest and
principal, the excess shall be paid by the Estate to the Stroud
Party making such tender.
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
(ECF No. 655 at 3.) The Court finds that this solution would be unworkable. The Simone
14
Estate has proposed no mechanism by which the Court could enforce such a judgment.
15
The Simone Estate next proposes that, if the Court refuses to include the above
16
language, that instead the Court should include the following language in the amended
17
judgment:
18
19
20
The Nina Simone Materials which the Stroud Parties are required
to deliver to the Simone Estate hereunder shall not include those
boxes of Nina Simone original audio recordings identified in the
September 11, 2005 appraisal from ICU Ent. Dist. (Document
626-1) as 1-9, 11-15, 30-33, 36A, 36B, 37-48, 50, 51, 51A, 52-55,
61-63, 65-79, 82, 85 or 86.
21
22
(Id. at 3-4.) The Court finds that this is the appropriate solution. Accordingly, the Court
23
ORDERS that the judgment shall be amended to reflect that the Simone Estate is awarded
24
monetary damages against the Stroud Parties, jointly and severally, in lieu of physical
25
possession of the boxes of Nina Simone recordings set forth above, in the amount of
26
$1,875,000.00 per box.
27
28
2
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: December 19, 2014
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?