Brown v. Stroud et al

Filing 660

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/19/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEVEN AMES BROWN, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 08-02348 JSW Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT ANDREW B. STROUD, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 Now before the Court is the Motion to Amend Judgment, filed by the Estate of Nina 17 Simone (“Simone Estate”). On October 21, 2014, the Court denied the Simone Estate’s motion 18 to amend to add Andy Stroud, Inc. (“ASI”) as a judgment debtor, reserved ruling on the Simone 19 Estate’s request to amend the judgment to receive an award of monetary damages, and granted 20 the Simone Estate’s request to amend the judgment to reflect the accurate representative of the 21 Simone Estate and address of the Simone Estate’s counsel. (ECF No. 642.) In that Order, the 22 Court invited the Simone Estate to move again to add ASI as a judgment debtor with more 23 supporting evidence, and directed the Simone Estate to clarify whether it was relinquishing its 24 rights to physical possession of any Nina Simone recordings for which it was awarded monetary 25 damages. (Id. at 4.) 26 In its response to the Court’s Order, the Simone Estate does not address the issue of 27 adding ASI as a judgment debtor, and does not provide any further evidence in support. The 28 Court’s ruling on this issue is therefore unchanged. 1 However, with respect to the Court’s Order that the Simone Estate clarify its position 2 regarding its rights to physical possession of any Nina Simone recordings for which it was 3 awarded monetary damages, the Simone Estate has clarified that it does not seek double 4 recovery. 5 The Simone Estate first proposes the following language be added to the judgment: 6 Should physical possession of any of the following boxes of Nina Simone original audio recordings identified in the September 11, 2005 appraisal from ICU Ent. Dist. (Document 626-1) be delivered by any of the Stroud Parties to the Simone Estate (1-9, 11-15, 30-33, 36A, 36B, 37-48, 50, 51, 51A, 52-55, 61-63, 65-79, 82, 85 or 86), the damages owing by the Stroud Parties to the Simone Estate hereunder shall be credited at the rate of $1,875,000.00 for each such identified box of recordings, first to any outstanding accrued interest and next to any outstanding principal. Should the cumulative credits for such returned original recordings exceed the outstanding unpaid accrued interest and principal, the excess shall be paid by the Estate to the Stroud Party making such tender. 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 (ECF No. 655 at 3.) The Court finds that this solution would be unworkable. The Simone 14 Estate has proposed no mechanism by which the Court could enforce such a judgment. 15 The Simone Estate next proposes that, if the Court refuses to include the above 16 language, that instead the Court should include the following language in the amended 17 judgment: 18 19 20 The Nina Simone Materials which the Stroud Parties are required to deliver to the Simone Estate hereunder shall not include those boxes of Nina Simone original audio recordings identified in the September 11, 2005 appraisal from ICU Ent. Dist. (Document 626-1) as 1-9, 11-15, 30-33, 36A, 36B, 37-48, 50, 51, 51A, 52-55, 61-63, 65-79, 82, 85 or 86. 21 22 (Id. at 3-4.) The Court finds that this is the appropriate solution. Accordingly, the Court 23 ORDERS that the judgment shall be amended to reflect that the Simone Estate is awarded 24 monetary damages against the Stroud Parties, jointly and severally, in lieu of physical 25 possession of the boxes of Nina Simone recordings set forth above, in the amount of 26 $1,875,000.00 per box. 27 28 2 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: December 19, 2014 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?