Martone et al v. Burgess et al

Filing 50

ORDER re 49 granting STIPULATION Dismissing Action with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(A)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/4/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Kevin D. Lally (SBN 095374) Edward Romero (SBN 148495) GREENAN, PEFFER, SALLANDER & LALLY LLP 6111 Bollinger Canyon Road, Suite 500 San Ramon, California 94583 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Mary McNamara (SBN 147131) August Gugelmann (SBN 240544) SWANSON, McNAMARA & HALLER LLP 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs MASSIMILIANO MARTONE and MARTONE RADIO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

MASSIMILIANO MARTONE, an individual; ) MARTONE RADIO TECHNOLOGY, INC., a ) Nevada Corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) DAVID BURGESS, an individual; KESTREL ) SIGNAL PROCESSING, INC., a California ) Corporation; RANGE NETWORKS, INC. ) ) Defendants. ) )

Case No. 08-2379 CW STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Courtroom: 2 [The Honorable Claudia Wilken]

Plaintiffs Massimiliano Martone ("Martone") and Martone Radio Technology, Inc. ("MRT") and defendants David Burgess ("Burgess"), Kestrel Signal Processing, Inc. (Kestrel") and Range Networks, Inc. ("Range"), (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate and agree that the Court may make and enter its Order as follows: 1
Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Action Case No. 08-2379 CW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1.

The Parties have resolved this action and jointly agree to dismiss the complaint

and the above referenced action with prejudice, in its entirety, by way of a stipulation and proposed order filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. Accordingly, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and

agree that the complaint and the above referenced action be dismissed with prejudice and that any injunction(s) entered in the action be dissolved forthwith. The Parties further stipulate that each party is to bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. /s/ Kevin D. Lally (SBN 095374) Edward Romero (SBN 148495) 6111 Bollinger Canyon Road, Suite 500 San Ramon, California
GREENAN, PEFFER, SALLANDER & LALLY, LLP

/s/ Mary McNamara (SBN 147131) August Gugelmann (SBN 240544) 300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94104
SWANSON, MCNAMARA & HALLER LLP

Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

MASSIMILIANO MARTONE and MARTONE RADIO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

MASSIMILIANO MARTONE and MARTONE RADIO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ ________________ Christopher W. Sweeney (SBN 143217) Law Offices of Christopher W. Sweeney 1500 Oliver Road, Suite K, PMB 321 Fairfield, California 94533 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID BURGESS, KESTREL SIGNAL PROCESSING, INC., and RANGE NETWORKS, INC.

2
Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Action Case No. 08-2379 CW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8/4/09 Dated: __________________

ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of plaintiffs Massimiliano Martone and Martone Radio Technology, Inc. and defendants David Burgess, Kestrel Signal Processing, Inc. and Range Networks, Inc., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the complaint in this action, and the action in its entirety, be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and that any injunction(s) entered in the action be and hereby are dissolved forthwith. Each party is to bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.

___________________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3
Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Action Case No. 08-2379 CW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

F:\LIT\Martone Technology (MRT)\Martone v. Burgess et al - USDC [CV 08 2379 ]\Pleadings\Stipulation Re Dismissal 7-23-09 (final).doc

4
Stipulation and Proposed Order Dismissing Action Case No. 08-2379 CW