Rouse v. Ayers

Filing 14

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/2/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)

Download PDF
Rouse v. Ayers Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATHANIEL R. ROUSE, ) No. C 08-02426 SBA (PR) ) Petitioner, ) JUDGMENT ) v. ) ) ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., ) ) Respondent. ) ) _________________________________________ ) For the reasons stated in the Court's Order Granting the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Petitioner. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/2/10 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATHANIEL RAY ROUSE, Plaintiff, v. R. AYERS JR. et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV08-02426 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 9, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Nathaniel Ray Rouse C-03721 California State Prison - San Quentin San Quentin, CA 94974 Dated: September 9, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 2 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 28 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?