Younas v. Patterson et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/6/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2009) Modified on 3/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, 44332 United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6915 FAX: (415) 436-7169 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION MOHAMMAD YOUNAS, Plaintiff, v. ANNE W. PATTERSON, U.S. Ambassador in Pakistan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-2553-SBA STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismissal of the above-captioned case without prejudice in light of the fact that the Department of State has agreed to process the Naz Iram's visa application. Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C 08-2553-SBA 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: March 5, 2009 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Date: March 5, 2009 /s/ ASHWANI K, BHAKHRI LAW OFFICES OF ASHWANI K. BHAKHRI Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dat e: 3/ 6/ 09 SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG United States District Judge STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C 08-2553-SBA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?