Holder v. Curry
Filing
24
ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING ON PETITIONER'S POST-REMAND REQUEST FOR RELEASE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
KEITH HOLDER,
5
Petitioner,
6
7
No. C 08-2572 CW (PR)
ORDER SCHEDULING BRIEFING ON
PETITIONER'S POST-REMAND
REQUEST FOR RELEASE
v.
BEN CURRY, Warden,
8
Respondent.
/
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
In an Order filed August 6, 2010, the Court granted
11
Petitioner’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28
12
U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the October 26, 2006 decision of the
13
California Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) to deny him parole.
14
particular, the Court ordered the BPH to “set a parole date for
15
Petitioner unless it finds new evidence, arising after the 2006
16
hearing, of current dangerousness.”
17
In
(Docket No. 9 at 25.)
On September 3, 2010, the Court granted Respondent's request
18
for a temporary stay of the Court's Order to allow Respondent time
19
to seek a stay in the Ninth Circuit.
20
Ninth Circuit stayed the Court’s Order pending appeal.
21
On November 30, 2010, the
On May 10, 2011, the Ninth Circuit granted Petitioner’s motion
22
to dismiss the appeal as moot, vacated the Court’s judgment and
23
remanded to this Court “for further proceedings consistent with this
24
order.”
25
(Docket No. 22 at 1.)
On May 16, 2011, Petitioner filed a “Post-Remand Request for
26
Immediate Release,” in which he argues he is entitled to release
27
from custody because the BPH held a new hearing on September 2,
28
2010, i.e., before this Court entered the temporary stay, and
1
granted Petitioner a parole date.
2
Ninth Circuit’s dismissal of Respondent’s appeal as moot entitles
3
Petitioner to release on parole.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Thus, Petitioner argues, the
Good cause appearing, the following briefing schedule is HEREBY
SET on Petitioner’s request:
Respondent shall file a response to Petitioner’s request no
later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order.
Petitioner shall file a reply to the response no later than
seven (7) days from the date the response is filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
12
5/24/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?