Lewis et al v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Filing 328

ORDER Granting 323 Stipulation to shorten time for consideration and ruling re 317 MOTION for Order Directing Notice to Overpaid Opt-Ins. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARTIN LEWIS, AARON COOPER, and ANISSA SCHILLING, on behalf of themselves and a class of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO & CO., CASE NO. 08-cv-2670 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR CONSIDERATION AND RULING ON SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING NOTICE TO OVERPAID OPTINS Defendant. WHEREAS, the Settlement Administrator is concurrently filing an Unopposed Motion for Order Directing Overpaid Opt-Ins to Return Overpayment to the Settlement Fund ("Unopposed Motion for Order") which seeks an Order directing notice be sent to Opt-Ins who were overpaid due to the Settlement Administrator's error in misinterpreting of one of the multipliers set forth in the Settlement Agreement to be used to calculate Opt-In awards, and requesting the overpaid OptIns return their overpayment to the Qualified Settlement Fund; WHEREAS, Counsel for Defendant and Plaintiffs' Counsel do not oppose the relief sought in the Unopposed Motion for Order; WHEREAS, should the Court hold a hearing on regular notice, the next available hearing date is October 20, 2011; WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would further the proper and efficient administration of justice in this case for an Order on the Settlement Administrator's Unopposed Motion for Order to be entered as soon as is practicable; - 1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR REVIEW AND DECISION CASE NO. 08-CV-2670 CW WHEREAS, the parties further agree that, subject to the Court's approval, the Unopposed Motion for Order may be decided on the papers without hearing; WHEREAS, payment to the underpaid Opt-Ins will be made after the hearing on this motion, if the time for hearing on the motion is shortened, and/or the Court rules without hearing, the underpaid Opt-Ins will receive the additional monies to which they are entitled earlier than if the matter is heard on regular notice; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULTED by the undersigned counsel on behalf of the parties identified below, and subject to the Court's approval, that they agree that the Unopposed Motion for Order may be decided on the papers without hearing. Dated: September 15, 2011 By: /s/ Jennifer Rappoport Jennifer Rappoport WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Counsel for Defendant Wells Fargo By: /s/ Jahan Sagafi Jahan Sagafi LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Counsel for Plaintiffs By: /s/ Thomas A. Warren Thomas A. Warren SETTLEMENT SERVICES, INC. Settlement Administrator I, Jennifer Rappoport, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. /s/ Jennifer Rappoport Jennifer Rappoport -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR REVIEW AND DECISION CASE NO. 08-CV-2670 CW 1 2 The Settlement Administrator's Unopposed Motion for Order shall be decided on the papers without a hearing. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: September 16 , 2011 The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge Northern District of California 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR REVIEW AND DECISION LA:299770.1 CASE NO. 08-CV-2670 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?