Lewis et al v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Filing
334
ORDER DISAPPROVING FURTHER CONTACT WITH OVERPAID OPT-INS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on December 14, 2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MARTIN LEWIS, et al.,
No. 08-02670 CW
7
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
DISAPPROVING
FURTHER CONTACT
WITH OVERPAID
OPT-INS
8
9
v.
WELLS FARGO & CO.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Defendant.
/
11
12
By letter, dated December 1, 2011, the Settlement
13
Administrator in this case, Settlement Services, Inc. (SSI)
14
requested that this Court issue an order allowing SSI to sent a
15
letter to the forty-five Opt-Ins who have not yet responded to the
16
letter and order previously sent to them by repaying their
17
overpayment or by contracting SSI to set up a payment plan; and to
18
take any other reasonable and appropriate steps to contact any such
19
Opt-Ins who have not returned their overpayments to discuss such
20
matters with them.
21
Having considered such request and the parties’ responses, the
22
Court now enters this Order and FINDS, CONCLUDES, and ORDERS as
23
follows:
24
1. This Court has continuing jurisdiction over this matter for
25
purposes of resolving issues related to administration and
26
effectuation of the Settlement.
Final Approval Order at XII
27
(Docket No. 315); Order Directing Notice to Overpaid Opt-Ins at ¶ 1
28
1
2
(Docket No. 329).
2. The Settlement Administrator’s request that it be allowed
3
again to contact via mail or via other reasonable methods any Opt-
4
Ins who have not yet returned their overpayment is DENIED.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: 12/14/2011
8
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?