Sunpower Corporation Systems v. Sunlink Corporation

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/13/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Frank E. Scherkenbach, (Bar No. 142549) scherkenbach@fr.com Fish & Richardson P.C. 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110-2804 Telephone: (617) 542-5070 Facsimile: (617) 542-8906 Howard G. Pollack (Bar No. 162897) pollack@fr.com Craig R. Compton (Bar No. 215491) compton@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant SUNPOWER CORPORATION, SYSTEMS QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Morgan W. Tovey (Bar No. 136242) morgantovey@quinnemanuel.com Linda J. Brewer (Bar No. 217730) lindabrewer@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant SUNLINK CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) SUNPOWER CORPORATION, SYSTEMS, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, vs. SUNLINK CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant and Counterclaimant. 1 SUNPOWER AND SUNLINK'S JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADR DEADLINE CASE NO. C 08-2807-SBA Case No. C 08-2807-SBA SUNPOWER CORPORATION SYSTEMS AND SUNLINK CORPORATION'S JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DEADLINE PATENT CASE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sunpower Corportation, Systems ("SunPower") and SunLink Corporation ("SunLink") respectfully submit the following stipulation and [Proposed] Order. I. BACKGROUND In September the parties met and conferred and participated in a telephone conference with the ADR Department where it was agreed that the parties would schedule a mediation session within 30 days of receipt of the Court's Claim Construction Order. On October 1, 2008 the parties participated in a Case Management Conference before your Honor and orally presented their joint proposal regarding timing for participation in the Alternate Dispute Resolution program. The Court confirmed that scheduling a mediation session within 30 days of the Claim Construction Order was acceptable. II. STIPULATION SunPower and SunLink hereby stipulate that they will schedule and participate in a mediation session within 30 days of receipt of the Court's Claim Construction Order. DATED: November 11, 2008 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. _/s/ Craig R. Compton______________ Craig R. Compton Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant SUNPOWER CORPORATION, SYSTEMS DATED: November 11, 2008 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP _/s/ Morgan W. Tovey______________ Morgan W. Tovey Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, SUNLINK CORPORATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Morgan W. Tovey. /// 2 SUNPOWER AND SUNLINK'S JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADR DEADLINE CASE NO. C 08-2807-SBA 1 DATED: November 11, 2008 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. _/s/ Craig R. Compton______________ Craig R. Compton Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant SUNPOWER CORPORATION, SYSTEMS 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 8 9 DATED: November 13 , 2008 9 110 0 111 1 112 2 113 3 114 4 115 5 116 6 117 7 118 8 119 9 220 0 221 1 222 2 223 3 224 4 225 5 226 6 227 7 228 8 3 SUNPOWER AND SUNLINK'S JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ADR DEADLINE CASE NO. C 08-2807-SBA ____________________________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?