Pecover et al v. Electronic Arts Inc.
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS 368 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Responses due by 5/9/2012. Replies due by 5/13/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEOFFREY PECOVER; and ANDREW
OWENS, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly
ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 08-2820 CW
MOTION FOR RELIEF
PRETRIAL ORDER OF
On April 23, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting
relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order entered by a
Magistrate Judge on April 9, 2012.
the Court hereby sets a briefing schedule on this motion as
Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2,
Defendant Electronic Arts, Inc. may file an opposition of
five pages or less within seven days of the date of this order.
Defendant shall address in its response whether Plaintiffs could
obtain the transcripts from the FTC through other means, with or
without Defendant’s written consent to the release of the
transcripts to Plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs may file a reply of three pages or less, within
four days after Defendants have filed their opposition.
The Court will decide Plaintiffs’ motion on the papers.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?