Pecover et al v. Electronic Arts Inc.

Filing 370

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS 368 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Responses due by 5/9/2012. Replies due by 5/13/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6

GEOFFREY PECOVER; and ANDREW
OWENS, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,

7
8
9

v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 08-2820 CW
ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM
NONDISPOSITIVE
PRETRIAL ORDER OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant.
________________________________/
On April 23, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting

13

relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order entered by a

14

Magistrate Judge on April 9, 2012.

15

the Court hereby sets a briefing schedule on this motion as

16

follows:

17

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2,

Defendant Electronic Arts, Inc. may file an opposition of

18

five pages or less within seven days of the date of this order.

19

Defendant shall address in its response whether Plaintiffs could

20

obtain the transcripts from the FTC through other means, with or

21

without Defendant’s written consent to the release of the

22

transcripts to Plaintiffs.

23
24
25

Plaintiffs may file a reply of three pages or less, within
four days after Defendants have filed their opposition.
The Court will decide Plaintiffs’ motion on the papers.

26
27
28

Dated: 5/2/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge