Chicago Metallic Corporation v. Detention Device Systems, Incorporated

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 29 Stipulation filed by Chicago Metallic Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/16/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GUY W. CHAMBERS (CA State Bar No. 101611) Email: [e-mail] MARC M. GORELNIK (CA State Bar No. 166833) Email: [e-mail] TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3834 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] EDWARD D. MANZO (admitted pro hac vice) Email: [e-mail] STEPHEN B HELLER (admitted pro hac vice) Email: [e-mail] LOUIS J. ALEX (admitted pro hac vice) Email: [e-mail] COOK ALEX LTD. 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2850 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff CHICAGO METALLIC CORPORATION JON MARK THACKER (CA State Bar No. 157182) Email: [e-mail] ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant DETENTION DEVICE SYSTEMS, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHICAGO METALLIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DETENTION DEVICE SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 08 3042 PJH

Chicago Metallic Corp. v. Detention Device Systems, Inc. STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 08 3042 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff Chicago Metallic Corporation, Inc. and Defendants Detention Device Systems, Inc. have entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving their controversies. Accordingly, the parties, through their counsel of record, agree that this action may be dismissed with prejudice, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth in Settlement Agreement, each party is to bear its own costs. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Guy W. Chambers Guy W. Chambers TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415 576-0200 (T) 415-576-0300 (F) Attorneys for Plaintiff Chicago Metallic Corporation

/s/ Jon Mark Thacker Jon Mark Thacker ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113 408-287-6262 (T) 408-918-4501 (F) Attorneys for Defendant Detention Device Systems, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. This action is dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement. 3. Except as otherwise set forth in Settlement Agreement, each party is to bear its own costs. 16 Dated: January _________, 2009

UNIT ED

The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court D RE

S

S DISTRICT TE C ______________________________________ TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

Chicago Metallic Corp. v. Detention Device Systems, Inc. STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 08 3042 PJH

A

C

LI

FO

hyllis Judge P

J. Hami

lton

R NIA

O IT IS S

ORDE

NO

RT

H

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
61714410 v1

General Order No. 45 Attestation of Signatures Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I, Guy W. Chambers, hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signaturies for whom a signature is indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

_____/s/ Guy W. Chambers______ Guy W. Chambers

Chicago Metallic Corp. v. Detention Device Systems, Inc. STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. CV 08 3042 PJH

3