Ispahani v. Mukasey et al
Filing
7
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/22/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008)
1 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Civil Division ILA C. DEISS, NY SBN 3052909 4 Assistant United States Attorney 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MARIAM ISPAHANI, 13 14 v. Plaintiff, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7124 FAX: (415) 436-7169 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) No. C 08-3111 SBA ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND ) ORDER ) ) )
15 MICHAEL MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States; MICHAEL CHERTOFF, 16 Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; JONATHAN SHARFEN, Acting ) ) 17 Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; ROBERT S. MUELLER, ) 18 III; PAUL NOVAK, Director, USCIS, Vermont ) Service Center, et al., ) ) 19 Defendants. ) 20 ) 21
Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendants by and through their attorney of
22 record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to dismissal of the action in light of 23 the adjudication of Plaintiff's adjustment of status application (Form I-485). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Stipulation to Dismiss C 08-3111 SBA 1
1
Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ ILA C. DEISS Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants /s/ SHAH PEERALLY ERICH KEEFE Attorneys for Plaintiff
2 Dated: October 17, 2008 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: October 17, 2008 9 10 11 12 13 14
ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________ SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG United States District Judge
15 Date: 10/22/08 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Dismiss C 08-3111 SBA 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?