Taurus Marine Inc. v. County of Marin, California

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION SCHEDULE re 52 Stipulation filed by Taurus Marine Inc., Manson Construction Company, Dutra Group. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/4/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

CHILES and PROCHNOW, LLP
1 Robert C. Chiles (SBN:056725)
[e-mail]
2 2600 El Camino Real, Suite 412
Palo Alto, California 94306-1719
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-565-8221
4
Attorneys for Claimants, Manson Construction Company
5 and the Dutra Group and the Joint Venture between Manson
Construction Company and the Dutra Group
6
George W. Nowell (SBN:83868)
7 [e-mail]
Paul B. Arenas (SBN:167863)
8 [e-mail]
John H. Cigavic III (SBN:231806)
9 [e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE W. NOWELL
10 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1990
San Francisco California 94104-4322
11 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
12
Attorneys for Petitioner, Taurus Marine, Inc.
13
14

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
Case No. CV083195 PJH
In Re Complaint of Taurus Maritime, Inc., as
18 owners and/or operators of the Tug, Terilyn, her
engines, tackle, appurtenances in a cause of
19 exoneration from or limitation of liability
STIPULATION FOR MOTION SCHEDULE
REGARDING PETITIONER’S PARTIAL
20
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION;
Petitioner
PROPOSED ORDER
vs.
21
Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
The County of Marin, State of California
22
Complaint Filed: July 2, 2008
Claimant
23
24
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
25
1.) Petitioner filed its motion for partial summary judgment on December 21, 2011 for
26
hearing before the Court on February 1, 2012 or such other date as the Court shall set.
27
2.) Claimants’ opposition to the motion shall be filed no later than 12:00 noon on January
28
-1Case No. CV083195 PJH
Stipulation for Motion Schedule and Proposed Order

9, 2012.

1
2

3.) Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed by 12:00 noon on January 18, 2012.

3 IT IS SO STIPULATED:
4

LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE W. NOWELL

5
6
7 Dated: December 22, 2011

By: ___/s/George W. Nowell__
George W. Nowell
Attorneys for Petitioner, Taurus Marine, Inc.

8
9
10

CHILES and PROCHNOW, LLP
11
12
13 Dated: December 22, 2011

By: __ _/s/ Robert C. Chiles
Robert C. Chiles
Attorneys for Claimants, Manson Construction
Company, the Dutra Group and the Joint
Venture between Manson Construction
Company and the Dutra Group

14
15
16
17
18

ORDER

19

The Court having reviewed this stipulation and good cause existing therefore, it is so

20 ordered.
21
UNIT
ED

S

January 4, 2012
23 Dated: December ________, 2011

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

22

____________________________________
DERED
SO OR
NO

hyllis J.

26
27
28
-2Case No. CV083195 PJH
Stipulation for Motion Schedule and Proposed Order

A

H

ER

n

Hamilto

LI

RT

25

Judge P

FO

Judge

24

R NIA

IT IS

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Case No. CV083195 PJH
Stipulation for Motion Schedule and Proposed Order