California Restaurant Association v. The City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 59

ORDER re (47 in 4:08-cv-03685-CW) granting STIPULATION Regarding Case Scheduling Order, (58 in 4:08-cv-03247-CW) granting STIPULATION Regarding Case Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/23/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Trenton H. Norris (SBN 164781) Sarah Esmaili (SBN 206053) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 90 New Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 356-3000 Facsimile: (415) 356-3099 Email: trent.norris@aporter.com Email: sarah.esmaili@aporter.com Peter L. Zimroth (pro hac vice) Kent A. Yalowitz (pro hac vice) Nancy G. Milburn (pro hac vice) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 715-1000 Facsimile: (212) 715-1399 Email: peter.zimroth@aporter.com Email: kent.yalowitz@aporter.com Email: nancy.milburn@aporter.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel (SBN 62139) Miguel Marquez (SBN 184621) Tamara Lange (SBN 177949) OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor San Jose, CA 95110-1770 Telephone: (408) 299-5900 Facsimile: (408) 292-7240 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and SANTA CLARA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and THE SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-08-3247 (CW) and Case No. CV-08-03685 (CW) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER Honorable Claudia Wilken Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney (SBN 139669) Francesca Gessner (SBN 247553) Tara M. Steeley (SBN 231775) Deputy City Attorneys 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place City Hall, Room 234 San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 Telephone: (415) 554-4762 Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 Email: francesca.gessner@sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NOS. CV 08-3247 (CW) AND CV. 08-03685 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION WHEREAS, on July 3, 2008, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines in California Restaurant Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, et al., Case No. CV-08-03247 CW (the "San Francisco" case), setting the initial Case Management Conference to take place on October 7, 2008; WHEREAS, on August 1, 2008, the Court issued an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines in California Restaurant Association v. The County of Santa Clara, et al., Case No. CV-08-03685 CW (the "Santa Clara County" case), setting the initial Case Management Conference to take place on November 19, 2008; WHEREAS, on August 15, 2008, the Court ordered the San Francisco and Santa Clara County cases related; WHEREAS, on August 28, 2008, the Court issued a Case Management Scheduling Order ("Order") rescheduling the Case Management Conference in these actions to take place on November 25, 2008; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to specify coordinated initial case management conference and ADR deadlines not specifically stated in the Order so that these deadlines correspond to the November 25, 2008 Case Management Conference date; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiff and Defendants, subject to approval of the Court, that the following deadlines associated with the November 25, 2008 Case Management Conference in these actions shall apply: 1. November 4, 2008: Last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan (per Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(f)). -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NOS. CV 08-3247 (CW) AND CV. 08-03685 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. November 4, 2008: Last day to file ADR Certification signed by parties and counsel (per Civ. L.R. 16-8). 3. November 4, 2008: Last day to file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (per Civ. L.R. 16-8). 4. November 18, 2008: Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report (per Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(1) and Civ. L.R. 16-8). The deadline for the parties to file a Case Management Conference Statement and the date of the Case Management Conference in these actions of November 25, 2008, as set out in the Order, are unaffected herein. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September __, 2008 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP By: Sarah Esmaili Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION Dated: September __, 2008 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney TARA M. STEELEY FRANCESCA GESSNER By: Tara M. Steeley Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NOS. CV 08-3247 (CW) AND CV. 08-03685 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September __, 2008 ANN MILLER RAVEL County Counsel TAMARA LANGE MIGUEL MARQUEZ By: Tamara Lange Attorneys for Defendants THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 9/23/08 Dated: ____________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING ORDER CASE NOS. CV 08-3247 (CW) AND CV. 08-03685

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?