Wren v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 11 Motion to Dismiss (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California LINDA WREN, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. _______________________________/ The motion of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for an order dismissing the first and second causes of action for failure to state a claim came on for hearing before this court on October 29, 2008. Plaintiff Linda Wren appeared by her counsel Richard Johnston, and defendant appeared by its counsel Michael A.S. Newman. Having read the parties' papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons stated at the hearing. The dismissal is WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The amended complaint shall be filed no later than November 12, 2008. No later than two weeks thereafter, defendant shall advise the court in writing whether it intends to file a motion for summary judgment. If not, an answer or a second motion to dismiss shall be filed within 20 days of the filing of the amended complaint. No. C 08-3361 PJH ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The date for the initial case management conference, previously set for Thursday, November 13, 2008, is VACATED. The court will reschedule the case management conference after defendant has advised the court regarding its anticipated response to the amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 30, 2008 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?