Hall v. Apartment Investment and Management Company
Filing
227
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS 226 MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
No. C 08-03447 CW
4
GREGORY HALL, et al.,
5
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
ORDER ON
PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME
(Docket No. 226)
v.
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
9
/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Plaintiffs Gregory Hall, et al., move for an order shortening
12
time (OST) on their Motion to Continue Trial Date and Modify
13
Scheduling Order.1
14
only Defendants against whom Plaintiffs have active claims, shall
15
respond to Plaintiffs’ motion for an OST four days from the date it
16
was filed.
17
granted, the Avilas’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Continue
18
will be due on two-days notice, and Plaintiffs’ reply will be due
19
one day after the Avilas’ opposition is filed.
20
to Continue will be decided on the papers.
21
Defendants Ismael and Moises Avila, who are the
Civ. L.R. 6-3(c).
If Plaintiffs’ motion for an OST is
Plaintiffs’ Motion
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
7/21/2011
Dated
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiffs have filed their proposed Motion to Continue as
an exhibit to their motion for an OST. Plaintiffs shall file their
Motion to Continue as a separate docket entry forthwith.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?