Hall v. Apartment Investment and Management Company

Filing 227

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS 226 MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
No. C 08-03447 CW

4

GREGORY HALL, et al.,

5

Plaintiffs,

6
7
8

ORDER ON
PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME
(Docket No. 226)

v.
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

9

/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

Plaintiffs Gregory Hall, et al., move for an order shortening

12

time (OST) on their Motion to Continue Trial Date and Modify

13

Scheduling Order.1

14

only Defendants against whom Plaintiffs have active claims, shall

15

respond to Plaintiffs’ motion for an OST four days from the date it

16

was filed.

17

granted, the Avilas’ opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Continue

18

will be due on two-days notice, and Plaintiffs’ reply will be due

19

one day after the Avilas’ opposition is filed.

20

to Continue will be decided on the papers.

21

Defendants Ismael and Moises Avila, who are the

Civ. L.R. 6-3(c).

If Plaintiffs’ motion for an OST is

Plaintiffs’ Motion

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

7/21/2011

Dated

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiffs have filed their proposed Motion to Continue as
an exhibit to their motion for an OST. Plaintiffs shall file their
Motion to Continue as a separate docket entry forthwith.