Curry v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 5/21/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2009) Modified on 5/26/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar #222173 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 Attorneys for Plaintiff DARRELL CURRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DARRELL CURRY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; et al. Defendants. / Case No. C 08 03695 SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION WHEREAS, the Court previously granted Plaintiff's counsel leave to file an Amended Complaint to name the individual Defendant Officers in the above-noted matter; and, WHEREAS Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint naming two individual Defendant Officers in the above-noted matter; and, WHEREAS Plaintiff erroneously identified one officer named in the First Amended Complaint as "S. VALLE," and should have named this Defendant Officer as "M. VALLE"; and, STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. - C 08 03695 SBA 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS neither Defendant S. BARRE nor the erroneously identified Defendant S. VALLE have answered the First Amended Complaint. The parties hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint, amended to reflect Defendant Officer M. VALLE as a Defendant Officer, and dismissing with prejudice S. VALLE as a named Defendant Officer. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: May 5, 2009 /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorneys for Plaintiff Darrell Curry /s/ Arlene M. Rosen Arlene M. Rosen Attorney for Defendants City of Oakland, et al. Dated: May 12, 2009 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/21/09 _______ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. - C 08 03695 SBA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?