Boston Scientific Corp. v. Medtronic Inc. et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 25 Stipulation filed by Boston Scientific Corp. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/14/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 KATHARINE L. ALTEMUS (SBN 227080) HOWREY LLP 2 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 3 Telephone: (650) 798-3512 4 Facsimile: (650) 798-3600 E-mail: altemusk@howrey.com 5 MATTHEW M. WOLF 6 EDWARD HAN HOWREY LLP 7 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 8 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 783-0800 9 Facsimile: (202) 383-6610 E-mail: wolfm@howrey.com 10 E-mail: hane@howrey.com 11 12 13 14 15 WALLACE WU (SBN 220110) HOWREY LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-1800 Facsimile: (213) 892-2300 E-mail: wuw@howrey.com H. MARK LYON (SBN 162061) FREDERICK S. CHUNG (SBN 183337) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 Email: MLyon@gibsondunn.com Email: FChung@gibsondunn.com KEVIN S. ROSEN (SBN 133304) MATTHEW A. HOFFMAN (SBN 227351) ANTHONY S. NEWMAN (SBN 235514) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 Email: KRosen@gibsondunn.com Email: MHoffman@gibsondunn.com Email: ANewman@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Galway, Ltd. 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff Boston Scientific Corp. 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 19 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., 20 21 22 vs. Plaintiff, MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC 23 VASCULAR, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY, LTD. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH Defendants. DM_US:21536154_1 1 The Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for November 20, 2008, and the 2 parties' joint case management statement is due November 13, 2008. In an effort to resolve their 3 disputes without the assistance of the Court, the parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, 4 jointly request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference from November 20, 2008 to 5 December 18, 2008 and reset the due date for the parties' joint case management statement. 6 The parties also agree that all pending due dates under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are 7 extended 30 days from their original due dates and all dates under the Patent Local Rules are moved 8 commensurate with the new Case Management Conference date to be set by the Court. 9 10 11 12 Dated: November 10, 2008 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/ H. Mark Lyon Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC., and MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY, LTD. Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from H. Mark Lyon, the signatory Respectfully submitted, HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Katharine L. Altemus Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. 24 listed above. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH DM_US:21536154_1 HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Katharine L. Altemus Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. 2 1 2 3 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 UNIT ED The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge RED S 11/14/08 4 Dated: ______________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH DM_US:21536154_1 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 A C LI FO hyllis Judge P J. Hami lton R NIA IT IS S O ORD E NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?