Boston Scientific Corp. v. Medtronic Inc. et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 29 Stipulation filed by Boston Scientific Corp. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/10/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2008)

Download PDF
1 Katharine L. Altemus (SBN 227080) HOWREY LLP 2 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 3 Telephone: (650) 798-3512 4 Facsimile: (650) 798-3600 E-mail: altemusk@howrey.com 5 Matthew M. Wolf (in propria persona) 6 Edward Han (in propria persona) HOWREY LLP 7 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 8 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 783-0800 9 Facsimile: (202) 383-6610 E-mail: wolfm@howrey.com 10 E-mail: hane@howrey.com 11 12 13 14 15 Wallace Wu (SBN 220110) HOWREY LLP 550 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-1800 Facsimile: (213) 892-2300 E-mail: wuw@howrey.com H. Mark Lyon (SBN 162061) Frederick S. Chung (SBN 183337) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 Email: MLyon@gibsondunn.com Email: FChung@gibsondunn.com Kevin S. Rosen (SBN 133304) Matthew A. Hoffman (SBN 227351) Anthony S. Newman (SBN 235514) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 Email: KRosen@gibsondunn.com Email: MHoffman@gibsondunn.com Email: ANewman@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Defendants Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Galway, Ltd. 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff Boston Scientific Corp. 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 19 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., 20 21 22 vs. Plaintiff, MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC 23 VASCULAR, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY, LTD. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH Defendants. DM_US:21643089_1 1 The Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for December 18, 2008 pursuant to 2 the Court's Order granting the parties' joint request to continue the Case Management Conference. 3 (Dkt. No. 27.) The parties remain engaged in discussions to resolve their disputes without the 4 assistance of the Court. In light of these discussions and for the purposes of preserving the resources 5 of the parties and the Court, the parties, through their respective undersigned counsel, jointly request 6 that the Court further continue the Case Management Conference from December 18, 2008 to January 7 22, 2009. 8 The parties also agree that all pending due dates under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are 9 extended 30 days from their current due dates and all dates under the Patent Local Rules are moved 10 commensurate with the new Case Management Conference date to be set by the Court. 11 12 Dated: December 5, 2008 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/ H. Mark Lyon H. Mark Lyon Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., MEDTRONIC USA, INC., and MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY, LTD. Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from H. Mark Lyon, the signatory Respectfully submitted, HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Katharine L. Altemus Katharine L. Altemus Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. 24 listed above. 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH DM_US:21643089_1 HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Katharine L. Altemus Katharine L. Altemus Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. 2 1 2 3 12/10/08 4 Dated: ______________________ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH DM_US:21643089_1 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 A C LI FO Ju llis J. H dge Phy amilton R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and 3 not a party to the within action. My business address is 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor, East Palo Alto, California 94303. 4 On December 5, 2008, I served on the interested parties in said action the within: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 X X STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) addressed as stated below and causing such envelope(s) to be deposited in the U.S. Mail at East Palo Alto, California. Mervey Mark Lyon mlyon@gibsondunn.com Medtronic@gibsondunn.com GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: 650-849-5300 Fax: 650-849-5333 (EMAIL/ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the submission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. (BY CM/ECF) I caused such document(s) to be sent via electronic mail through the Case Management/Electronic File system with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of 21 this Court at whose direction the service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Case No. CV 08 3844 PJH DM_US:21643089_1 Executed on December 5, 2008, at East Palo Alto, California. Tammy Miller (Type or print name) /s/ Tammy Miller (Signature) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?