Medina et al v. City of Menlo Park et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 Stipulation Granting Plaintiffs Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 5/19/2009. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) KENNETH W. BRAKEBILL (CA SBN 196696) NATALIE NAUGLE (CA SBN 240999) SARINA SALUJA (CA SBN 253781) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN (CA SBN 133203) RANKIN, LANDSNESS, LAHDE, SERVERIAN & STOCK 96 No. Third Street, Suite 500 San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorney for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION MARIA MEDINA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MENLO PARK, et al., Defendants. Complaint Filed: August 18, 2008 Trial Date: August 11, 2009 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. CV 08-3946 WDB

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 08-3946 WDB

1

sf-2682321

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiffs Maria Medina, Walter Campos, Hector Luis Valencia, Javier Anguiano, Samuel Salgado, Rodolfo Medina, Joel Antonio Vasquez-Medina, Jose Jesus Espinoza, Francisco Leon, and Oscar Campos, ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City of Menlo Park, Jonathan Baxter, Nicholas Douglas, Ronald Prickett, Thomas Crutchfield, and Joshua Venzon ("Defendants") (collectively "the Parties"), through their respective counsel, present the following stipulation granting Plaintiffs leave to file Second Amended Complaint. WHEREAS Plaintiffs desire to amend their Complaint to add a state law malicious prosecution claim against all Defendants in this matter; WHEREAS Plaintiffs' [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit 1; WHEREAS all Defendants to this action consent to the filing of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, however, Defendants do not consent to the allegations contained therein; Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, shall be deemed filed, and served as of the date of the Court's execution of the appended Order hereto; 2. Defendants shall file and serve a response to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint within the time permitted pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 15(a). The foregoing stipulation is agreed to by:

Dated: May 18, 2009

Respectfully submitted, ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ KENNETH W. BRAKEBILL NATALIE NAUGLE SARINA SALUJA MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By:

/s/ Natalie Naugle Natalie Naugle

AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 08-3946 WDB

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2

sf-2682321

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. CV 08-3946 WDB

Dated: May 18, 2009

MICHAEL C. SERVERIAN RANKIN, LANDSNESS, LAHDE, SERVERIAN & STOCK

By:

/s/ Michael C. Serverian Michael C. Serverian Attorney for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

Dated: __5/___2009 ___________ _ 19/ ____

By:

Ju

ER

D I S T are being I, Natalie Naugle, am the ECF user whose ID and password R I C T Oused to file this
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Michael C. Serverian has concurred in this filing. Dated: May 18, 2009 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ KENNETH W. BRAKEBILL NATALIE NAUGLE SARINA SALUJA MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

N

F

By:

/s/ Natalie Naugle Natalie Naugle Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3

sf-2682321

A

C

LI

FO

r yne D. B dge Wa

azil

R NIA

Judge Wayne D. Brazil

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H