Fonovisa Inc et al v. Doe

Filing 7

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 3 Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JOHN DOE, Defendant. ___________________________________/ FONOVISA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-08-3996 EMC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE DISCOVERY (Docket No. 3) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Upon Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Immediate Discovery, the Declaration of Carlos Linares, and the accompanying Memorandum of Law, the Court hereby finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated good cause for the expedited discovery sought herein. See UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Does, No. 06-0652 SBA (EMC), 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32821 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2006). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs may serve immediate discovery on the University of California, Santa Cruz, to obtain the identity of Defendant John Doe by serving a Rule 45 subpoena that seeks information sufficient to identify Defendant John Doe, including the name, current (and permanent) address and telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any information disclosed to Plaintiffs in response to the Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiffs solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiffs' rights under the Copyright Act. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if and when the University of California, Santa Cruz, is served with the subpoena, within five (5) business days thereof it shall give written notice, which 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 can include use of e-mail, to the subscriber(s) whose identity is to be disclosed in response to the subpoena. If the University of California, Santa Cruz, and/or Defendant wishes to move to quash the subpoena, they shall do so before the return date of the subpoena, which shall be thirty (30) business days from the date of service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if and when the University of California, Santa Cruz, is served with a subpoena, the University of California, Santa Cruz, shall preserve the data and information sought in the subpoena pending resolution of any timely filed motion to quash. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiffs shall provide a copy of this order to the University of California, Santa Cruz, when the subpoena is served. The University of California, Santa Cruz, should in turn provide a copy of this order to Defendant, again within five (5) business days of service of the subpoena on the University of San Francisco. This order disposes of Docket No. 3. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2008 _______________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?