Cicala et al v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
65
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Grewal for Settlement re (84 in 4:09-cv-00176-CW), (73 in 4:09-cv-02617-CW) (64 in 4:08-cv-04032-CW) Stipulation. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/5/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
PAUL CICALA, et al.,
5
6
Plaintiffs,
ORDER OF REFERENCE
TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
v.
7
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
8
Defendants.
________________________________/
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 08-04032 CW
FRANCISCO VALDEZ, et al.,
11
12
No. C 09-00176 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
13
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
________________________________/
15
16
RONALD HEIMAN,
19
20
C 09-2617 CW
Plaintiff,
17
18
No.
v.
OFFICER JOHNSON, et al.,
Defendants.
/
21
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1 and the request of parties,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is referred to
24
Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal for a settlement conference to be
25
held at the convenience of the Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
26
Counsel shall be advised of the date, time, and place of
27
28
appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge.
Although
1
there are three cases in different postures, the Court recommends
2
that all three be scheduled for the same day, and addressed in
3
separate sessions as necessary.
4
able to devote the length of time or scheduling flexibility that a
5
private mediator would.
6
A magistrate judge will not be
Counsel and the parties will be required
to adjust their calendars to the availability of the magistrate
7
judge.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: 1/5/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
11
12
Cc: MagRef; PSG
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?