Cicala et al v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 65

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Grewal for Settlement re (84 in 4:09-cv-00176-CW), (73 in 4:09-cv-02617-CW) (64 in 4:08-cv-04032-CW) Stipulation. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/5/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PAUL CICALA, et al., 5 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. 7 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 8 Defendants. ________________________________/ 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California No. C 08-04032 CW FRANCISCO VALDEZ, et al., 11 12 No. C 09-00176 CW Plaintiffs, v. 13 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 14 Defendants. ________________________________/ 15 16 RONALD HEIMAN, 19 20 C 09-2617 CW Plaintiff, 17 18 No. v. OFFICER JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. / 21 22 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1 and the request of parties, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is referred to 24 Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal for a settlement conference to be 25 held at the convenience of the Magistrate Judge’s calendar. 26 Counsel shall be advised of the date, time, and place of 27 28 appearance by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge. Although 1 there are three cases in different postures, the Court recommends 2 that all three be scheduled for the same day, and addressed in 3 separate sessions as necessary. 4 able to devote the length of time or scheduling flexibility that a 5 private mediator would. 6 A magistrate judge will not be Counsel and the parties will be required to adjust their calendars to the availability of the magistrate 7 judge. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Dated: 1/5/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 11 12 Cc: MagRef; PSG 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?