Meas v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 124

ORDER re 113 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A GAG ORDER AGAINST PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 6/3/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Before the court is defendants' motion for a gag order pending the trial of this matter. In view of the continuance of the trial date, it is not clear to the court whether plaintiff simply does not oppose the motion or whether he is waiting to respond at a time closer to the August trial date. When defendants requested leave to file said motion at the pretrial conference, it was the court's intention that the motion be filed as one for administrative relief which would be resolved expeditiously and without a hearing. Accordingly, if plaintiff wishes to oppose the motion, he must do so no later than June 11, 2010. No reply shall be filed and no hearing will be held. JONATHAN MEAS, Plaintiff(s), No. C 08-4075 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?