Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 102

STIPULATION and Proposed Order re Settlement Conference, filed by Google Inc., Netlist, Inc.. (Ezgar, Geoffrey) (Filed on 2/16/2010) Modified on 2/17/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TIMOTHY T. SCOTT (CA Bar No. 126971/[e-mail]) GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (CA Bar No. 184243/[e-mail]) LEO SPOONER III (CA Bar No. 241541/[e-mail]) KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) ROBERT F. PERRY ([e-mail]) ALLISON ALTERSOHN (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) SUSAN KIM (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) MARK H. FRANCIS (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) DANIEL MILLER (pro hac vice/[e-mail]) King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOOGLE INC. Adrian M. Pruetz (CA Bar No. 118215/[e-mail]) Erica J. Pruetz (CA Bar No. 227712/[e-mail]) PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 1525 El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310.765.7641 Steven R. Hansen (CA Bar No. 198401/[e-mail]) Enoch H. Liang (CA Bar No. 212324/[e-mail]) LEE, TRAN & LIANG APLC 601 S. Figueroa St., Ste. 4025 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 213.612.3773 Attorneys for Defendant, NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. Case No. 08-04144 SBA

Related to: 09-5718 SBA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 08-04144 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, on February 2, 2010 the Court issued an Order Denying Joint Motion to Consolidate, wherein the Court required the parties file a joint statement and proposed order specifying whether they preferred to have both Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc., Case No. 08-4144, and Netlist, Inc. v. Google Inc., Case No. 09-5718 ( "the Cases") referred to a Magistrate Judge for an early settlement conference or proceed before a private mediator; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred on the issue; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 1. The parties elect to have the Cases referred to a Magistrate Judge for an early settlement conference; 2. While the parties are in agreement that such settlement conference should proceed before a Magistrate Judge, they have not yet reached agreement on the specific Magistrate Judge to handle such settlement conference. The parties intend to continue to meet and confer on this issue and will report back to the Court no later than Monday, February 22, 2010.

Dated: February 16, 2010

ADRIAN M. PRUETZ PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP

By: /s/ Adrian M. Pruetz ADRIAN M. PRUETZ Attorneys for Defendant NETLIST, INC. Dated: February 16, 2010 KING & SPALDING LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar__________________ GEOFFREY M. EZGAR Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC.

2
STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 08-04144 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 16, 2010

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Adrian Pruetz.

KING & SPALDING LLP

By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar GEOFFREY M. EZGAR Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February __, 2010 Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge

3
STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 08-04144 SBA