Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 148

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 144 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Google's Invalidity Motion and Exhibits B and C to the Declaration of Scott T. Weingaertner in Support Thereof be FILED UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 6/21/10 (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TIMOTHY T. SCOTT (SBN 126971/tscott@kslaw.com) GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (SBN 184243/ gezgar@kslaw.com) LEO SPOONER III (SBN 241541/lspooner@kslaw.com) KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 590-0700 Facsimile: (650) 590-1900 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (pro hac vice/sweingaertner@kslaw.com) ROBERT F. PERRY (rperry@kslaw.com) ALLISON ALTERSOHN (pro hac vice/aaltersohn@kslaw.com) SUSAN KIM (pro hac vice/skim@kslaw.com) DANIEL MILLER (pro hac vice/dmiller@kslaw.com) King & Spalding LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION GOOGLE INC. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. C08 04144 SBA [Related to Civil Action No. C09-05718 SBA] v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. STIPULATION AND ORDER RE FILING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY AND RELATED EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL Date: Time: Place: Judge: July 27, 2010 1:00pm Courtroom 3 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL--C-08-04144 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Paragraph 26 of the Court's Second Amended Protective Order, dated March 5, 2010 (Docket No. 108), requires the parties to file under seal all "transcripts of deposition, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, pleadings, briefs, and other documents submitted to the Court that have been designated as Protected Information or which contain information so designated." Google Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity ("Google's Invalidity Motion") includes information designated by Google and Netlist as Protected Information under the terms of the Second Amended Protective Order. The information includes excerpts of exhibits and deposition transcripts that have been so designated. Therefore, Google is obligated to file its Google's Invalidity Motion and Exhibits B and C to the Declaration of Scott T. Weingaertner in support thereof under seal. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, by and through their counsel of record, that Google's Invalidity Motion and Exhibits B and C to the Declaration of Scott T. Weingaertner in support thereof be under seal. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL--C-08-04144 SBA DATED: June 18, 2010 KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar ________ Geoffrey M. Ezgar Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. DATED: June 18, 2010 LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/ Steven R. Hansen _________ Steven R. Hansen Attorneys for Defendant NETLIST, INC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 6/21/10 ______________________________ Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL--C-08-04144 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: June 18, 2010 DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Steven R. Hansen. KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar ________ Geoffrey M. Ezgar Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. 4 JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL--C-08-04144 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?