Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 163

***ERRONEOUS ENTRY, PLEASE REFER TO DOCUMENT 164 *** STIPULATION AND ORDER, Document sealed. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/8/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010) Modified on 7/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF). Modified on 7/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Doc. 163

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PRUETZ LAW GROUP LLP Adrian M. Pruetz (Bar No. CA 118215/[e-mail]) Erica J. Pruetz (Bar No. CA 227712/[e-mail]) 200 N. Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 1525 El Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC Enoch H. Liang (Bar No. CA 212324/[e-mail]) Steven R. Hansen (Bar No. CA 198401/[e-mail]) Edward S. Quon (Bar No. 214197/[e-mail]) 601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 4025 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant NETLIST, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

GOOGLE, INC., Plaintiff, vs. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. ___________________________________ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO. C-08-04144 SBA [Related to CASE NO. C-09-05718 SBA] JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE FILING NETLIST, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT AND RELATED EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL Date: Time: Place: Judge: July 27, 2010 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 3 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING NETLIST'S REPLY UNDER SEAL ­ C-08-04144 SBA
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Dated:

Paragraph 26 of the Court's Second Amended Protective Order, dated March 5, 2010 (Docket No. 108) requires the parties to file under seal all "transcripts of depositions, exhibits, answers to interrogatories, pleadings, briefs, and other documents submitted to the Court that have been designated as Protected Information or which contain information so designated." Netlist, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement and in Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement ("Netlist's Reply Brief") includes information designated by Google, Inc. and third parties IDT and NEC as Protected Information under the terms of the Second Amended Protective Order. The information includes excerpts of exhibits and deposition transcripts that have been so designated. Therefore, Netlist is obligated to file its Reply Brief and Exhibits 1 and 5 to the Declaration of Steven R. Hansen in support thereof ("Hansen Reply Dec.") under seal. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, by and through their counsel of record, that Netlist's Reply Brief and Exhibits 1 and 5 to the Declaration of Steven R. Hansen in support thereof be filed under seal. July 6, 2010 LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/ Steven R. Hansen______________________ Steven R. Hansen Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant NETLIST, INC. July 6, 2010 LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/ Robert F. Perry ______________________ Robert F. Perry Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GOOGLE, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/8/10 _________________________ Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1
JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING NETLIST'S REPLY UNDER SEAL ­ C-08-04144 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Robert F. Perry. Dated: July 6, 2010 LEE TRAN & LIANG, APLC By: /s/ Steven R. Hansen______________________ Steven R. Hansen Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant NETLIST, INC.

2
JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING NETLIST'S REPLY UNDER SEAL ­ C-08-04144 SBA