Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/17/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Juanita Brooks (CA Bar No. 75934/brooks@fr.com) Seth M. Sproul (CA Bar No. 217711/sproul@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 David J. Miclean (CA Bar No. 115098/miclean@fr.com) Christina D. Jordan (CA Bar No. 245944/cjordan@fr.c0m) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. James Pooley (CA Bar No. 58041/jpooley@mofo.com) L. Scott Oliver (CA Bar No. 174824/soliver@mofo.com) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 Attorneys for Defendant NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Case No. C 08-04144 SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. C 08-04144 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) _ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: X Private ADR (please identify process and provider): Mediation The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline Dated: 12/11/08__________ /s/ David J. Miclean__________________ Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ L. Scott Oliver____________________ Attorneys for Defendant Dated: 12/12/08__________ ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) _ X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. C 08-04144 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deadline for ADR session X 90 days from the date of this order. other IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 12/17/08 ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 50623294.doc 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Case No. C 08-04144 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?