Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/17/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Juanita Brooks (CA Bar No. 75934/[e-mail]) Seth M. Sproul (CA Bar No. 217711/[e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] David J. Miclean (CA Bar No. 115098/[e-mail]) Christina D. Jordan (CA Bar No. 245944/cjordan@fr.c0m) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. James Pooley (CA Bar No. 58041/[e-mail]) L. Scott Oliver (CA Bar No. 174824/[e-mail]) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant NETLIST, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

Case No. C 08-04144 SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ­ Case No. C 08-04144 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) _ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: X Private ADR (please identify process and provider): Mediation

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline

Dated: 12/11/08__________

/s/ David J. Miclean__________________ Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ L. Scott Oliver____________________ Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: 12/12/08__________

ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) _ X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ­ Case No. C 08-04144 SBA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Deadline for ADR session X 90 days from the date of this order. other

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 12/17/08

________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

50623294.doc

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ­ Case No. C 08-04144 SBA