Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER Confirming Deposition Dates of Jayesh Bhakta and Jeffrey Solomon. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/31/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2009)

Download PDF
Case4:08-cv-04144-SBA Document43 Filed07/28/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 J u a n i t a Brooks (CA B a r No. 7 5 9 3 4 / b r o o k s @ f r . c o m ) F I S H & R I C H A R D S O N P .C. 12390 EI C a m i n o Real S a n Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 6 7 8 - 5 0 7 0 Facsimile: (858) 6 7 8 - 5 0 9 9 D a v i d J. M i c l e a n (CA B a r No. 115098/micIean@fr.com) C h r i s t i n a D. J o r d a n (CA B a r No. 2 4 5 9 4 4 / c j o r d a n @ f r . c o m ) S h e l l e y K. M a c k (CA B a r No. 2 0 9 5 9 6 / m a c k @ f r . c o m ) R o b e r t 1. K e n t (CA B a r No. 2 5 0 9 0 5 / r j k e n t @ f r . c o m ) F I S H & R I C H A R D S O N P.C. 500 A r g u e l l o Street, S u i t e 5 0 0 R e d w o o d City, C A 94063 Telephone: (650) 8 3 9 - 5 0 7 0 F a c s i m i l e : (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for P l a i n t i f f G O O G L E INC. AdrianM. Pruetz(CABarNo.118215) ampruetz@pmetzlaw.com) E r i c a J. P r u e t z (CA Bar. No. 2 2 7 7 1 2 ) ejpmetz@pmetz1aw.com. P R U E T Z L A W G R O U P LLP. 2 0 0 N. S e p u l v e d a Blvd., S u i t e 1525 EI Segundo, CA 90245 Telephone: (310) 7 6 5 - 7 6 5 0 Facsimile: (310) 765-7641 A t t o r n e y s for D e f e n d a n t N E T L I S T , INC. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N D I S T R I C T OF C A L I F O R N I A OAKLAND DIVISION C a s e No. Plaintiff, 08-04144 S B A JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING DEPOSITION DATES O F JAYESH BHAKTA AND JEFFREY SOLOMON Defendant. 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING DEPOSITION DATES OF JAYESH BHAKTAAND JEFFREY SOWMON Case No. 08-04144 SBA Case4:08-cv-04144-SBA Document43 Filed07/28/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 IT IS H E R E B Y STIPULATED and confirmed b y and b e t w e e n Google Inc. and Netlist, Inc., through their respective counsel o f record, t h a t t h e depositions o f J ayesh B h a k t a and Jeffrey S o l o m o n will t a k e p l a c e as noticed on A u g u s t 13, 2009 and August 14, 2009, respectively; and IT IS H E R E B Y F U R T H E R STIPULATED b y Google that, in light o f the p a r t i e s ' stipulation confirming the above deposition dates, Google withdraws its m o t i o n to compel Netlist to p r e s e n t Messrs. B h a k t a and Solomon for deposition, which m o t i o n is currently p e n d i n g before Judge Spero. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: J u l y 28,2009 P R U E T Z L A W GROUP LLP A D R I A N M. P R U E T Z 2 r ' { l e a " J ? J , ()~~ 12 13 14 Dated: J u l y 28,2009 15 16 17 18 19 506652I5.doc Attorneys for Defendant NETLIST, INC. FISH & R I C H A R D S O N P.C. By: l s i Christina D Jordan CHRISTINA D. J O R D A N Attorneys for P l a i n t i f f GOOGLE, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING DEPOSITION DATES OF JAYESH BHAKTA ANDJEFFREY SOLOMON Case No. 0804144 SBA Case4:08-cv-04144-SBA Document43 Filed07/28/09 Page3 of 3 1 D E C L A R A T I O N OF C O N S E N T 2 3 4 5 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty o f perjury that concurrence in the filing o f this document has b e e n obtained from Adrian M. Pruetz, 6 Dated: July 28, 2009 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 7 8 9 10 By: / s l Christina D Jordan CHRISTINA D. JORDAN Attorneys for P l a i n t i f f GOOGLE, INC. 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONFIRMING DEPOSITION DATES OF JAYESH BHAKTA AND JEFFREY SOLOMON Case No. 08-04144 SBA A C LI . Spero HONORAudLe JJOSEPH C. SPERO B g E oseph C J United States Magistrate Judge FO R NIA 7/ _ Dated: _31 _- ' , 2 0 0 9 UNIT ED S 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?