Google Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Filing 92

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Scott T. Weingaertner ( Filing fee $ 210, receipt number 44611004730.) filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TIMOTHY T. SCOTT (SBN 126971) tscott@kslaw.com GEOFFREY M. EZGAR (SBN 184243) gezgar@kslaw.com LEO SPOONER III (SBN 241541) lspooner@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 590-0700 Facsimile: (650) 590-1900 ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Civil Action No. C08 04144 SBA NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL OF ROBERT F. PERRY GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NETLIST, INC., Defendant. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL OF ROBERT F. PERRY CASE NO. C08 04144 SBA 1 2 3 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL OF ROBERT F. PERRY TO THE COURT, DEFENDANT, AND ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Robert F. Perry of the law firm of King & Spalding LLP, hereby enters his appearance as 5 counsel for Plaintiff Google Inc., in the above action, and requests notice of all hearings and 6 other proceedings in the action and service of all orders, pleadings and other papers. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL OF ROBERT F. PERRY Respectfully submitted this 27th day of January 2010. KING & SPALDING LLP By: /s/ Robert F. Perry Robert F. Perry I hereby certify that Robert F. Perry concurs in the e-filing of this document. Dated: January 27, 2010 /s/ Geoffrey M. Ezgar Geoffrey M. Ezgar 2 CASE NO. C08 04144 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?