Banga v. Experian Information Solutions et al

Filing 237

ORDER RE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED. The following cases are not related: Cases C 05-4417 MMC Banga v. Experian Information Solutions, and C 08-4147 SBA Banga v. Experian Information Solutions, et al. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2009)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RELATED CASE ORDER An Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related has been filed, stating that the following cases may be related within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12: C 05-4417 MMC C 08-4147 SBA Banga v. Experian Information Solutions Banga v. Experian Information Solutions, et al. ORDER On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases: [X] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). [ ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). Counsel are instructed that all future filings in this reassigned case are to bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in the reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the undersigned; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned. DATED: October 23, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?